Comparative environmental and economic assessment of greenhouse cucumber and opuntia ficus-indica cultivation in arid regions

) than O. ficus-indica. For the cucumber, the operational phase was dominated by diesel and electricity consumption, which influenced global warming (90.8%), ozone formation (88.5%), and ecotoxicity potential (59-78%). Both crops showed significant impacts during the greenhouse construction phase (> 95% contribution), linked mainly to materials such as concrete and cables. The integrated analysis confirmed that the cultivation of O. ficus-indica reduced total environmental impacts by 75% compared to cucumber. Although the economic analysis highlighted a higher internal rate of return (21.49%) and a shorter payback period (6.44 years) for cucumber, its cultivation was not economically justifiable due to the nearly 10 times higher water and fuel consumption. This study suggests O. ficus-indica cultivation as a sustainable low-input alternative with a more balanced footprint in water-scarce and climate-sensitive regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-43088-5
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative environmental and economic assessment of greenhouse cucumber and opuntia ficus-indica cultivation in arid regions

Fatemeh Einollahipeer, Hajar Abyar, Sahel Pakzad-Toochaei
Scientific Reports
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Comparative environmental and economic assessment of greenhouse cucumber and opuntia ficus-indica cultivation in arid regions

Fatemeh Einollahipeer, Hajar Abyar, Sahel Pakzad-Toochaei
article en

Abstract

) than O. ficus-indica. For the cucumber, the operational phase was dominated by diesel and electricity consumption, which influenced global warming (90.8%), ozone formation (88.5%), and ecotoxicity potential (59-78%). Both crops showed significant impacts during the greenhouse construction phase (> 95% contribution), linked mainly to materials such as concrete and cables. The integrated analysis confirmed that the cultivation of O. ficus-indica reduced total environmental impacts by 75% compared to cucumber. Although the economic analysis highlighted a higher internal rate of return (21.49%) and a shorter payback period (6.44 years) for cucumber, its cultivation was not economically justifiable due to the nearly 10 times higher water and fuel consumption. This study suggests O. ficus-indica cultivation as a sustainable low-input alternative with a more balanced footprint in water-scarce and climate-sensitive regions.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Zabol University (IR), Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources (IR)
National Science Foundation, Iran National Science Foundation, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, University of Zabol
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.