Colostomy in patients with anorectal malformation with rectoperineal fistula or rectovestibular fistula: a single-center experience

This study summarizes the clinical characteristics of colostomy in children with anorectal malformation (ARM) with rectoperineal fistula (RPF) or rectovestibular fistula (RVF) to inform surgical decision-making. Medical records of children with RPF or RVF undergoing colostomy were retrospectively reviewed to analyze indications. Among 761 rectoperineal fistula and 295 rectovestibular fistula patients, 124 received colostomy: 16 (2.1%) with RPF and 108 (36.6%) with RVF. Indications for colostomy in sixteen RPF were: nonvisible fistula with high Pouch-Perineum (P-P) distance (n = 5), prior colostomy elsewhere (n = 4), penile or scrotal fistula with high P-P distance (n = 2), high P-P distance alone (n = 2), perineal body fistula in a female (n = 1), failed intraoperative pouch identification (n = 1), and necrotizing enterocolitis (n = 1). For rectovestibular fistula (n = 108), indications included: treatment pre-2018 (n = 49, 45.4%), poor general condition or severe anomalies (n = 14, 12.9%), small fistula with persistent distension despite dilation (n = 13, 12.0%), failed prior repair on colostomy (n = 9, 8.3%), neonatal abdominal distension or defecation difficulty (n = 4, 3.7%), fistula near posterior commissure (n = 4, 3.7%), and tethered cord syndrome, reduction of neonatal wound complications, nonvisible fistula with high P-P distance, staged repair choice, or secondary megacolon (each 2.8%, n = 3). For children with fistula at the penis or scrotum and high Pouch-Perineum distance, primary repair carries risks of rectal pouch misidentification and urethral injury. In rectoperineal fistula cases without a visible fistula and with a high Pouch-Perineum distance, colostomy is often unavoidable. A staged surgical procedure is recommended for patients with rectovestibular fistula in cases of poor general condition, severe concomitant congenital malformations, unresolved defecation difficulties following anal dilatation, or a fistula near the posterior commissure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Gastroenterology
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-026-04734-4
Primary Topic
Congenital gastrointestinal and neural anomalies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Colostomy in patients with anorectal malformation with rectoperineal fistula or rectovestibular fistula: a single-center experience

Xianming Xiao, Pengfei Chen, Jinping Hou, Zhili Wang et al.
BMC Gastroenterology
Congenital gastrointestinal and neural anomalies
article

Colostomy in patients with anorectal malformation with rectoperineal fistula or rectovestibular fistula: a single-center experience

Xianming Xiao, Pengfei Chen, Jinping Hou, Zhili Wang, Wei Feng, Yi Wang
article en

Abstract

This study summarizes the clinical characteristics of colostomy in children with anorectal malformation (ARM) with rectoperineal fistula (RPF) or rectovestibular fistula (RVF) to inform surgical decision-making. Medical records of children with RPF or RVF undergoing colostomy were retrospectively reviewed to analyze indications. Among 761 rectoperineal fistula and 295 rectovestibular fistula patients, 124 received colostomy: 16 (2.1%) with RPF and 108 (36.6%) with RVF. Indications for colostomy in sixteen RPF were: nonvisible fistula with high Pouch-Perineum (P-P) distance (n = 5), prior colostomy elsewhere (n = 4), penile or scrotal fistula with high P-P distance (n = 2), high P-P distance alone (n = 2), perineal body fistula in a female (n = 1), failed intraoperative pouch identification (n = 1), and necrotizing enterocolitis (n = 1). For rectovestibular fistula (n = 108), indications included: treatment pre-2018 (n = 49, 45.4%), poor general condition or severe anomalies (n = 14, 12.9%), small fistula with persistent distension despite dilation (n = 13, 12.0%), failed prior repair on colostomy (n = 9, 8.3%), neonatal abdominal distension or defecation difficulty (n = 4, 3.7%), fistula near posterior commissure (n = 4, 3.7%), and tethered cord syndrome, reduction of neonatal wound complications, nonvisible fistula with high P-P distance, staged repair choice, or secondary megacolon (each 2.8%, n = 3). For children with fistula at the penis or scrotum and high Pouch-Perineum distance, primary repair carries risks of rectal pouch misidentification and urethral injury. In rectoperineal fistula cases without a visible fistula and with a high Pouch-Perineum distance, colostomy is often unavoidable. A staged surgical procedure is recommended for patients with rectovestibular fistula in cases of poor general condition, severe concomitant congenital malformations, unresolved defecation difficulties following anal dilatation, or a fistula near the posterior commissure.

BMC Gastroenterology
Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (CN), Chongqing Medical University (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Congenital gastrointestinal and neural anomalies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.