Retrospective study of the clinical value of genetic testing in the diagnosis and treatment of lung squamous cell carcinoma

Abstract Objectives To assess the necessity and clinical value of genetic testing in lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) diagnosis and treatment. Methods This retrospective study enrolled 1,515 LSCC patients from Chongqing University Cancer Hospital. Medical records were reviewed to analyze gene mutations, treatment and healthcare economic outcomes for clinical benefit evaluation. Results Of 1,515 patients, 292 received genetic testing (221 smokers, 71 non-smokers). Fifty-six had clear driver gene mutations, with a 19.2% detection rate, dominated by EGFR (n = 26) and MET (n = 10) mutations. In non-smokers, the incidence of EGFR mutations (66.7%, 20/30) was significantly higher than that of other mutations, while the mutation types were scattered in smokers. Patients aged ≤ 65 years, females and non-smokers showed higher mutation rates. Targeted therapy improved objective response rate, disease control rate and median progression-free survival, with fewer grade 3–4 adverse events (4.7% vs 40.0%). Cost-effectiveness analysis showed a negative incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, meaning targeted therapy delivered better outcomes at lower costs. Conclusions Genetic testing is highly recommended for LSCC patients, especially non-smokers, those aged ≤ 65 years and females. Its combination with targeted therapy offers significant clinical benefits and favorable cost-effectiveness, guiding treatment selection and prognosis improvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Oncology
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-026-06282-5
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Retrospective study of the clinical value of genetic testing in the diagnosis and treatment of lung squamous cell carcinoma

Lin Xiong, Haiping Huang, Jun Fang, Huiwen Ma
1 links
Discover Oncology
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
article

Retrospective study of the clinical value of genetic testing in the diagnosis and treatment of lung squamous cell carcinoma

Lin Xiong, Haiping Huang, Jun Fang, Huiwen Ma
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To assess the necessity and clinical value of genetic testing in lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) diagnosis and treatment. Methods This retrospective study enrolled 1,515 LSCC patients from Chongqing University Cancer Hospital. Medical records were reviewed to analyze gene mutations, treatment and healthcare economic outcomes for clinical benefit evaluation. Results Of 1,515 patients, 292 received genetic testing (221 smokers, 71 non-smokers). Fifty-six had clear driver gene mutations, with a 19.2% detection rate, dominated by EGFR (n = 26) and MET (n = 10) mutations. In non-smokers, the incidence of EGFR mutations (66.7%, 20/30) was significantly higher than that of other mutations, while the mutation types were scattered in smokers. Patients aged ≤ 65 years, females and non-smokers showed higher mutation rates. Targeted therapy improved objective response rate, disease control rate and median progression-free survival, with fewer grade 3–4 adverse events (4.7% vs 40.0%). Cost-effectiveness analysis showed a negative incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, meaning targeted therapy delivered better outcomes at lower costs. Conclusions Genetic testing is highly recommended for LSCC patients, especially non-smokers, those aged ≤ 65 years and females. Its combination with targeted therapy offers significant clinical benefits and favorable cost-effectiveness, guiding treatment selection and prognosis improvement.

Discover Oncology
Chongqing University (CN), Chongqing Cancer Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon