Lumbar multifidus muscle morphology on MRI after restorative neurostimulation for chronic low back pain: a single centre case series using the Goutallier classification

Single Centre case series. Restorative neurostimulation of the lumbar multifidus muscle is a novel therapy for chronic low back pain (CLBP). The effects of this therapy on the MRI appearances of the human multifidus are unknown. Here we describe changes in patients after restorative neurostimulation therapy. A single centre case series. Patients who had lumbar MRI scans before and after restorative neurostimulation therapy were identified. Demographic data, history of prior lumbar spinal surgery, time between MRI scans, duration of and clinical response to restorative neurostimulation, and indications for the MRI scan were retrieved. Using the index and post-stimulation T2 weighted axial MRI images the multifidus was graded using the Goutallier classification, bilaterally at the L3/4, L4/5, and L5/S1 disc space levels. The findings were compared to control CLBP patients. Fifteen patients were identified (mean age 58 ± 12 yrs; 10 female and 5 male). The mean time between the two MRI scans was 31.8 months (95% CI 24.9–38.7 months) and the mean duration of restorative stimulation was 17.9 months (95% CI 13.1–22.7 months), range 13–39 months. Of the 90 muscle gradings 61 (68%; 95% CI 57–77%) were unchanged between the two scans; 24 (27%; 95% CI 18–37%) were worse by one or less points on the Goutallier Classification, and five (6%; 95%CI 2–12%) were better by one or less points. The pattern of these changes at the L3/4, L4/5, and L5/S1 levels was almost identical. Patients with prior lumbar spinal surgery (n = 7) had significantly worse baseline Goutallier scores than those (n = 8) not having had surgery (2.0 ± 0.9 v 1.6 ± 0.6; p = 0.038).There were no significant differences in changes in Goutallier scores between (i) clinical responders and non-responders to restorative neurostimulation; and (ii) those who did or did not have prior lumbar surgery. Neither duration of restorative neurostimulation nor time between index and second MRI significantly influenced changes in Goutallier scores. Findings in control CLBP patients (n = 15) were almost identical to those having restorative neurostimulation. Using the Goutallier classification serial MRI changes in the multifidus muscle following restorative neurostimulation are like those seen in control CLBP patients. Further studies using additional methods of muscle analysis are needed to provide insights about mechanisms underlying the benefits of multifidus restorative neurostimulation therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Spine Journal
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-026-09863-8
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lumbar multifidus muscle morphology on MRI after restorative neurostimulation for chronic low back pain: a single centre case series using the Goutallier classification

Derek Yull, Ian R. Whittle, Mike Selby, Yun-Hom Yau
European Spine Journal
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Lumbar multifidus muscle morphology on MRI after restorative neurostimulation for chronic low back pain: a single centre case series using the Goutallier classification

Derek Yull, Ian R. Whittle, Mike Selby, Yun-Hom Yau
article en

Abstract

Single Centre case series. Restorative neurostimulation of the lumbar multifidus muscle is a novel therapy for chronic low back pain (CLBP). The effects of this therapy on the MRI appearances of the human multifidus are unknown. Here we describe changes in patients after restorative neurostimulation therapy. A single centre case series. Patients who had lumbar MRI scans before and after restorative neurostimulation therapy were identified. Demographic data, history of prior lumbar spinal surgery, time between MRI scans, duration of and clinical response to restorative neurostimulation, and indications for the MRI scan were retrieved. Using the index and post-stimulation T2 weighted axial MRI images the multifidus was graded using the Goutallier classification, bilaterally at the L3/4, L4/5, and L5/S1 disc space levels. The findings were compared to control CLBP patients. Fifteen patients were identified (mean age 58 ± 12 yrs; 10 female and 5 male). The mean time between the two MRI scans was 31.8 months (95% CI 24.9–38.7 months) and the mean duration of restorative stimulation was 17.9 months (95% CI 13.1–22.7 months), range 13–39 months. Of the 90 muscle gradings 61 (68%; 95% CI 57–77%) were unchanged between the two scans; 24 (27%; 95% CI 18–37%) were worse by one or less points on the Goutallier Classification, and five (6%; 95%CI 2–12%) were better by one or less points. The pattern of these changes at the L3/4, L4/5, and L5/S1 levels was almost identical. Patients with prior lumbar spinal surgery (n = 7) had significantly worse baseline Goutallier scores than those (n = 8) not having had surgery (2.0 ± 0.9 v 1.6 ± 0.6; p = 0.038).There were no significant differences in changes in Goutallier scores between (i) clinical responders and non-responders to restorative neurostimulation; and (ii) those who did or did not have prior lumbar surgery. Neither duration of restorative neurostimulation nor time between index and second MRI significantly influenced changes in Goutallier scores. Findings in control CLBP patients (n = 15) were almost identical to those having restorative neurostimulation. Using the Goutallier classification serial MRI changes in the multifidus muscle following restorative neurostimulation are like those seen in control CLBP patients. Further studies using additional methods of muscle analysis are needed to provide insights about mechanisms underlying the benefits of multifidus restorative neurostimulation therapy.

European Spine Journal
The University of Adelaide (AU)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.