Development and application of a multidimensional instrument to evaluate competency discrepancies in orthodontic practice

Contemporary orthodontic practice faces challenges related to treatment complications, often linked to deficiencies in multidisciplinary clinical competency. A clear understanding of the coordination across the stomatognathic system is essential, yet no standardized instrument exists to assess core skills. This study aimed to develop and validate a comprehensive assessment tool and evaluate current competency levels and associated factors among Chinese orthodontists across dental, periodontal, temporomandibular joint (TMJ), and myofunctional domains. A cross-sectional survey was conducted across multiple regions of China from January to June 2025 among 434 practicing orthodontists []. A three-component assessment instrument was developed through systematic expert review: Subjective Competency Scale (SCS), Clinical Practice Behavior Scale (CPBS), and Objective Knowledge Test for Orthodontists (OKTO). Psychometric properties were evaluated through exploratory factor analysis, reliability testing, and validity assessment. Competency variations across four domains were analyzed using Friedman tests, and demographic predictors were identified through stepwise multiple regression. The instrument demonstrated satisfactory reliability (SCS: Cronbach’s α = 0.897) and validity. Significant competency disparities existed across domains (all p < 0.001). Orthodontists showed highest competencies in dental areas (SCS: 4.45 ± 0.77; practice compliance: 78.00%) but substantial deficits in TMJ (SCS: 3.33 ± 1.17; practice compliance: 56.45%) and myofunctional domains. Objective knowledge patterns revealed adequate TMJ knowledge (82.58%) but poor myofunctional understanding (68.26%). Educational attainment emerged as the strongest predictor (β = 0.262, p < 0.001), followed by age (β = 0.201) and continuing education participation (β = 0.127). This study represents an initial attempt to develop and validate a multidimensional competency assessment framework for orthodontists, with the aim of offering a structured approach to evaluating interdisciplinary clinical competencies. TMJ and myofunctional domain-specific deficiencies, which were found to be associated with educational attainment, may serve as potential risk factors affecting treatment stability and complication prevention within the Chinese clinical context. This instrument, with preliminary validation evidence based on a Chinese sample, offers a tentative framework for systematic competency evaluation that requires further validation across diverse contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-08237-2
Primary Topic
Dental Education, Practice, Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and application of a multidimensional instrument to evaluate competency discrepancies in orthodontic practice

Zhihui Mai, Chiyuen Cheung, Shaoqin Tu, Hongfei Lu et al.
BMC Oral Health
Dental Education, Practice, Research
article

Development and application of a multidimensional instrument to evaluate competency discrepancies in orthodontic practice

Zhihui Mai, Chiyuen Cheung, Shaoqin Tu, Hongfei Lu, Hong Ai, Yuyao Liu, YiTing Shao, Yi Feng, Xinyuan Chen, Zheng Chen
article en

Abstract

Contemporary orthodontic practice faces challenges related to treatment complications, often linked to deficiencies in multidisciplinary clinical competency. A clear understanding of the coordination across the stomatognathic system is essential, yet no standardized instrument exists to assess core skills. This study aimed to develop and validate a comprehensive assessment tool and evaluate current competency levels and associated factors among Chinese orthodontists across dental, periodontal, temporomandibular joint (TMJ), and myofunctional domains. A cross-sectional survey was conducted across multiple regions of China from January to June 2025 among 434 practicing orthodontists []. A three-component assessment instrument was developed through systematic expert review: Subjective Competency Scale (SCS), Clinical Practice Behavior Scale (CPBS), and Objective Knowledge Test for Orthodontists (OKTO). Psychometric properties were evaluated through exploratory factor analysis, reliability testing, and validity assessment. Competency variations across four domains were analyzed using Friedman tests, and demographic predictors were identified through stepwise multiple regression. The instrument demonstrated satisfactory reliability (SCS: Cronbach’s α = 0.897) and validity. Significant competency disparities existed across domains (all p < 0.001). Orthodontists showed highest competencies in dental areas (SCS: 4.45 ± 0.77; practice compliance: 78.00%) but substantial deficits in TMJ (SCS: 3.33 ± 1.17; practice compliance: 56.45%) and myofunctional domains. Objective knowledge patterns revealed adequate TMJ knowledge (82.58%) but poor myofunctional understanding (68.26%). Educational attainment emerged as the strongest predictor (β = 0.262, p < 0.001), followed by age (β = 0.201) and continuing education participation (β = 0.127). This study represents an initial attempt to develop and validate a multidimensional competency assessment framework for orthodontists, with the aim of offering a structured approach to evaluating interdisciplinary clinical competencies. TMJ and myofunctional domain-specific deficiencies, which were found to be associated with educational attainment, may serve as potential risk factors affecting treatment stability and complication prevention within the Chinese clinical context. This instrument, with preliminary validation evidence based on a Chinese sample, offers a tentative framework for systematic competency evaluation that requires further validation across diverse contexts.

BMC Oral HealthVol. 26(1)
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Dental Education, Practice, Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.