A Novel Simulation Framework for Evaluating and Optimizing Oncology Outreach Policies in a Regional Cancer System

BACKGROUND: Oncology outreach is a common strategy for addressing cancer workforce shortages, where traveling oncologists commute across healthcare settings to extend specialized care. However, methods for evaluating and optimizing outreach strategies are limited. METHODS: We developed a simulation framework for evaluating and optimizing potential outreach strategies and applied it to two test cases within Dartmouth Health's hub-and-spoke cancer system. Our approach involved sampling incident patients and visit capacity across oncologist/site pairs, assigning patients to oncologist/site pairs, and estimating the total patient travel time incurred across two groups: (1) where a portion of patient visits is shifted from the hub facility to a satellite, and (2) where the original distribution of patient visits is retained. After 5000 simulations, the mean difference in patient travel time among groups was computed to estimate patient travel time savings. We identified the optimal number of new patient visits to reallocate from the hub to satellite that maximized patient travel time savings. RESULTS: We identified satellites in St. Johnsbury, VT and Manchester, NH as candidates for increased medical and radiation oncology outreach, respectively. At St. Johnsbury, we found that reallocating 45% of new medical oncology visits resulted in 140 (95% CI: 97-174) total hours saved. For patients whose care was shifted, this corresponded to an average of 1.07 (95% CI: 0.75-1.34) hours saved per visit. At Manchester, we found that reallocating 50% of new radiation oncology visits resulted in 55 (95% CI: 34-71) total hours saved. For patients whose care was shifted, this corresponded to an average of 1.13 (95% CI: 0.70-1.44) hours saved per visit. CONCLUSION: Simulations offer a valuable means to assess the effectiveness and uncertainty of potential outreach strategies. Such approaches are well positioned to provide administrative decision support for health systems and can be leveraged to inform directional investments in outreach policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Medicine
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.71771
Primary Topic
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Novel Simulation Framework for Evaluating and Optimizing Oncology Outreach Policies in a Regional Cancer System

Erika L. Moen, Bruno T. Scodari, Nirav S. Kapadia, Ashlee A. Korsberg et al.
Cancer Medicine
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
article

A Novel Simulation Framework for Evaluating and Optimizing Oncology Outreach Policies in a Regional Cancer System

Erika L. Moen, Bruno T. Scodari, Nirav S. Kapadia, Ashlee A. Korsberg, A. James O'Malley, Gabriel A. Brooks
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oncology outreach is a common strategy for addressing cancer workforce shortages, where traveling oncologists commute across healthcare settings to extend specialized care. However, methods for evaluating and optimizing outreach strategies are limited. METHODS: We developed a simulation framework for evaluating and optimizing potential outreach strategies and applied it to two test cases within Dartmouth Health's hub-and-spoke cancer system. Our approach involved sampling incident patients and visit capacity across oncologist/site pairs, assigning patients to oncologist/site pairs, and estimating the total patient travel time incurred across two groups: (1) where a portion of patient visits is shifted from the hub facility to a satellite, and (2) where the original distribution of patient visits is retained. After 5000 simulations, the mean difference in patient travel time among groups was computed to estimate patient travel time savings. We identified the optimal number of new patient visits to reallocate from the hub to satellite that maximized patient travel time savings. RESULTS: We identified satellites in St. Johnsbury, VT and Manchester, NH as candidates for increased medical and radiation oncology outreach, respectively. At St. Johnsbury, we found that reallocating 45% of new medical oncology visits resulted in 140 (95% CI: 97-174) total hours saved. For patients whose care was shifted, this corresponded to an average of 1.07 (95% CI: 0.75-1.34) hours saved per visit. At Manchester, we found that reallocating 50% of new radiation oncology visits resulted in 55 (95% CI: 34-71) total hours saved. For patients whose care was shifted, this corresponded to an average of 1.13 (95% CI: 0.70-1.44) hours saved per visit. CONCLUSION: Simulations offer a valuable means to assess the effectiveness and uncertainty of potential outreach strategies. Such approaches are well positioned to provide administrative decision support for health systems and can be leveraged to inform directional investments in outreach policies.

Cancer MedicineVol. 15(4)
Dartmouth College (US), Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice (US), Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.