Real-world application of the international myositis assessment and clinical studies group guidelines on cancer risk stratification

OBJECTIVES: The 2023 International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Group (IMACS) guidelines introduced a standardized risk-stratification model for cancer screening in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). However, real-world data on their application remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of IMACS-based risk stratification in predicting malignancy and assess adherence to cancer screening recommendations in a multicentric Italian IIM cohort. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre retrospective study including 411 IIM patients from five Italian rheumatology centres, classified into IMACS-defined standard, intermediate and high-risk groups. Cancer occurrence within three years of IIM diagnosis was assessed. Screening practices prior to the implementation of IMACS guidelines were compared with their recommendations. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the predictive value of IMACS stratification. RESULTS: Among 411 patients, 180 (43.8%) were classified as high-risk, 156 (37.7%) as intermediate-risk and 75 (18.2%) as standard-risk. Cancer was diagnosed in 9.2% of patients within three years of IIM onset, with high-risk patients significantly more likely to develop malignancy (OR = 4.05, P = 0.026). Anti-TIF1γ (OR = 12.3, P < 0.001) and anti-SAE1 (OR = 11.9, P = 0.012) were independent predictors of cancer. Screening adherence varied, with underutilization of enhanced screening in intermediate-risk patients and a decline in screening over time. CONCLUSION: The IMACS stratification model effectively predicts cancer risk in IIM. However, real-world screening practices show inconsistencies, particularly in intermediate-risk patients. These findings support the need for optimized, risk-adapted malignancy surveillance in IIM and refinement of current guidelines based on real-world data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lara D. Veeken
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keag171
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world application of the international myositis assessment and clinical studies group guidelines on cancer risk stratification

Angela Ceribelli, Silvia Cavalli, Antonio Tonutti, Edoardo Conticini et al.
Lara D. Veeken
Inflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis
article

Real-world application of the international myositis assessment and clinical studies group guidelines on cancer risk stratification

Angela Ceribelli, Silvia Cavalli, Antonio Tonutti, Edoardo Conticini, Maria Rosa Pellico, Claudia Iannone, Nicoletta Del Papa, Silvia Grazzini, Ilaria Magi, Antonina Minniti, Cristina Bochicchio, Manuel Sette, Veronica Batani, Ilaria Cavazzana, Roberto Caporali, Corrado Campochiaro, Silvia Della Pina, Giacomo De Luca, Alessia Gatti
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The 2023 International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Group (IMACS) guidelines introduced a standardized risk-stratification model for cancer screening in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). However, real-world data on their application remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of IMACS-based risk stratification in predicting malignancy and assess adherence to cancer screening recommendations in a multicentric Italian IIM cohort. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre retrospective study including 411 IIM patients from five Italian rheumatology centres, classified into IMACS-defined standard, intermediate and high-risk groups. Cancer occurrence within three years of IIM diagnosis was assessed. Screening practices prior to the implementation of IMACS guidelines were compared with their recommendations. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the predictive value of IMACS stratification. RESULTS: Among 411 patients, 180 (43.8%) were classified as high-risk, 156 (37.7%) as intermediate-risk and 75 (18.2%) as standard-risk. Cancer was diagnosed in 9.2% of patients within three years of IIM onset, with high-risk patients significantly more likely to develop malignancy (OR = 4.05, P = 0.026). Anti-TIF1γ (OR = 12.3, P < 0.001) and anti-SAE1 (OR = 11.9, P = 0.012) were independent predictors of cancer. Screening adherence varied, with underutilization of enhanced screening in intermediate-risk patients and a decline in screening over time. CONCLUSION: The IMACS stratification model effectively predicts cancer risk in IIM. However, real-world screening practices show inconsistencies, particularly in intermediate-risk patients. These findings support the need for optimized, risk-adapted malignancy surveillance in IIM and refinement of current guidelines based on real-world data.

Lara D. VeekenVol. 65(4)
University of Siena (IT), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT), Humanitas University (IT), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT), University of Milan (IT), Brescia University (US), Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia (IT), Istituto Ortopedico Gaetano Pini (IT), IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital (IT), University of Brescia (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Inflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.