Embryotoxic effects of diflubenzuron active ingredient and commercial formulations: comparative insights from zebrafish model

Diflubenzuron (DFB) is a larvicide widely incorporated into pesticide product formulations (PPFs). In addition to the active ingredient (AI), PPFs contain inert substances and adjuvants that may interfere with the AI toxicity. This study aims to compare the embryotoxicity of a veterinary powder (VF; 3% DFB) and an agricultural water-soluble pellet (AF; 80% DFB) towards DFB, referred to as AI (purity > 99%). Zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos were exposed to AI and both formulations at low (0.025 and 0.125 mg L− 1 of AI); intermediate (0.25 and 1.25 mg L− 1 of AI); and high (2.5 and 10 mg L− 1 of AI) concentrations, as well as a reconstituted water (fish medium) and DMSO (0.4% v/v) controls. Survival, hatching rates, pigmentation, and morphological biomarkers were monitored over 120 h post-fertilization (hpf). No significant effects on survival or hatching rates were observed. Morphological abnormalities, such as notochord deformities and yolk sac opacity, occurred at all concentrations, differing in frequency and intensity. AI showed stronger effects at lower and intermediate concentrations, whereas AF and VF exhibited stronger effects at higher concentrations. Oxygen consumption did not differ significantly from controls. Regarding morphometry, AF induced more pronounced alterations than both PPFs, mainly at intermediate and high concentrations, affecting sensory, physiological, skeletal, and muscle parameters. VF caused minor changes, AI showed no significant effects, and AF presented greater toxicity. AF caused an increase while AI and VF resulted in a slight decrease in body pigmentation. Our findings suggest that PPFs may enhance toxicity by increasing the AI solubility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecotoxicology
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-026-03078-9
Primary Topic
Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Embryotoxic effects of diflubenzuron active ingredient and commercial formulations: comparative insights from zebrafish model

Bruno Fiorelini Pereira, Fábio Kummrow, Flávio Kiyoshi Tominaga, Amanda de Azevedo Valle et al.
Ecotoxicology
Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
article

Embryotoxic effects of diflubenzuron active ingredient and commercial formulations: comparative insights from zebrafish model

Bruno Fiorelini Pereira, Fábio Kummrow, Flávio Kiyoshi Tominaga, Amanda de Azevedo Valle, Victoria Marcella Ferreira Almeida, Anna Virginia Pike, Maria Célia Sanches Oliveira Luz, Maysa Zungolo Burrattino, Aline Isabella de Souza, Aline Garnevi Fávero, João Pedro Camargo Mitne, Rafaella Silva Brito
article en

Abstract

Diflubenzuron (DFB) is a larvicide widely incorporated into pesticide product formulations (PPFs). In addition to the active ingredient (AI), PPFs contain inert substances and adjuvants that may interfere with the AI toxicity. This study aims to compare the embryotoxicity of a veterinary powder (VF; 3% DFB) and an agricultural water-soluble pellet (AF; 80% DFB) towards DFB, referred to as AI (purity > 99%). Zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos were exposed to AI and both formulations at low (0.025 and 0.125 mg L− 1 of AI); intermediate (0.25 and 1.25 mg L− 1 of AI); and high (2.5 and 10 mg L− 1 of AI) concentrations, as well as a reconstituted water (fish medium) and DMSO (0.4% v/v) controls. Survival, hatching rates, pigmentation, and morphological biomarkers were monitored over 120 h post-fertilization (hpf). No significant effects on survival or hatching rates were observed. Morphological abnormalities, such as notochord deformities and yolk sac opacity, occurred at all concentrations, differing in frequency and intensity. AI showed stronger effects at lower and intermediate concentrations, whereas AF and VF exhibited stronger effects at higher concentrations. Oxygen consumption did not differ significantly from controls. Regarding morphometry, AF induced more pronounced alterations than both PPFs, mainly at intermediate and high concentrations, affecting sensory, physiological, skeletal, and muscle parameters. VF caused minor changes, AI showed no significant effects, and AF presented greater toxicity. AF caused an increase while AI and VF resulted in a slight decrease in body pigmentation. Our findings suggest that PPFs may enhance toxicity by increasing the AI solubility.

EcotoxicologyVol. 35(5)
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.