Radiofrequency Ablation and Chemotherapy vs Chemotherapy Only in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer:The PELICAN Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE: The poor prognosis and limited treatment options in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) highlight the need for novel therapies to increase survival. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the addition of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) to chemotherapy improves survival when compared with chemotherapy only in patients with nonprogressive LAPC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This international randomized clinical trial was performed from April 7, 2015, through December 6, 2022, in patients with unresectable LAPC with at least stable disease after 2 months of induction chemotherapy. The predefined study protocol reported a follow-up period of 18 months. Data analysis was performed from February 1, 2024, through January 15, 2025. INTERVENTION: Randomization to receive either RFA with chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival, adverse events, and quality of life using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire and pancreatic cancer module. RESULTS: Overall, 188 patients (median [IQR] age, 65 [57-70] years; 100 [53%] men) were randomized, 95 to RFA with chemotherapy and 93 to chemotherapy only. Before randomization, induction chemotherapy had consisted of modified FOLFIRINOX (fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and leucovorin) in 81 patients (85%) and a gemcitabine-based regimen in 14 patients (15%) in the RFA group vs 80 patients (86%) and 13 patients (14%) in the chemotherapy group, respectively. After a median follow-up of 55 months, median overall survival from randomization was 12.1 months (95% CI, 9.9-14.3 months) in the RFA group vs 11.6 months (95% CI, 9.4-13.9 months) in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.80-1.45; P = .64). Median progression-free survival was 5.8 months (95% CI, 4.4-7.2 months) in the RFA group and 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.3-8.5 months) in the chemotherapy group (P = .47). Grade 3 or higher serious adverse events were reported more often in the RFA group: 26 patients (27%) vs 10 patients (11%) (P = .004). Mean changes from baseline of -14.6, -12.0, and -18.4 were observed for the Global Health Status quality-of-life scores at 1, 3, and 18 months, respectively, numerically exceeding the threshold of 10 points for clinical relevance. In the chemotherapy-only group, mean changes from baseline on the Global Health Status remained below the threshold for clinical relevance. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This randomized clinical trial of patients with LAPC after 2 months of multiagent chemotherapy found that local ablative therapy with RFA did not improve survival compared with chemotherapy only and adversely affected patient's quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03690323.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)
Published
2026-03-31
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Radiofrequency Ablation and Chemotherapy vs Chemotherapy Only in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer:The PELICAN Randomized Clinical Trial

Elizabeth Pando, L. Brada, Maarten W. Nijkamp, Otto M. van Delden et al.
Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

Radiofrequency Ablation and Chemotherapy vs Chemotherapy Only in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer:The PELICAN Randomized Clinical Trial

Elizabeth Pando, L. Brada, Maarten W. Nijkamp, Otto M. van Delden, Krijn P. van Lienden, Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group, Geert Roeyen, Karin Groothuis, Geert A. Cirkel, Lois A. Daamen, Jeroen Hagendoorn, Marieke S. Walma, Maartje Los, Thomas L. Bollen, Frank J. Wessels, Martijn W J Stommel, Mike S L Liem, Steffi J. E. Rombouts, Leonie J. M. Mekenkamp, Other research (not in main researchprogram), Arts-assistenten Radiologie, Trialbureau Beeld, Heelkunde Opleiding, Inne H.M. Borel Rinkes, Outcome Evaluation, MS Medische Oncologie, Olivier R. Busch, Ronald M van Dam, Mathieu D'Hondt, CTM & Statistical consultation, Freek Daams, Peter M van de Ven, Judith de Vos-Geelen, Cancer, MS CGO, Manon N Braat, Marco B Polée, Rutger C G Bruijnen, MS Radiologie, Hjalmar C. van Santvoort, I. Quintus Molenaar, Johanna W. Wilmink, Ignace H J T de Hingh, Marc G Besselink, Gijs A. Patijn, Leonard W F Seelen, MS HOD, C Yung Nio, Sebastiaan Festen, Jan J J de Vries, Vincent E de Meijer, Wouter J M Derksen, Wouter W. te Riele
article en

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: The poor prognosis and limited treatment options in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) highlight the need for novel therapies to increase survival. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the addition of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) to chemotherapy improves survival when compared with chemotherapy only in patients with nonprogressive LAPC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This international randomized clinical trial was performed from April 7, 2015, through December 6, 2022, in patients with unresectable LAPC with at least stable disease after 2 months of induction chemotherapy. The predefined study protocol reported a follow-up period of 18 months. Data analysis was performed from February 1, 2024, through January 15, 2025. INTERVENTION: Randomization to receive either RFA with chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival, adverse events, and quality of life using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire and pancreatic cancer module. RESULTS: Overall, 188 patients (median [IQR] age, 65 [57-70] years; 100 [53%] men) were randomized, 95 to RFA with chemotherapy and 93 to chemotherapy only. Before randomization, induction chemotherapy had consisted of modified FOLFIRINOX (fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and leucovorin) in 81 patients (85%) and a gemcitabine-based regimen in 14 patients (15%) in the RFA group vs 80 patients (86%) and 13 patients (14%) in the chemotherapy group, respectively. After a median follow-up of 55 months, median overall survival from randomization was 12.1 months (95% CI, 9.9-14.3 months) in the RFA group vs 11.6 months (95% CI, 9.4-13.9 months) in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.80-1.45; P = .64). Median progression-free survival was 5.8 months (95% CI, 4.4-7.2 months) in the RFA group and 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.3-8.5 months) in the chemotherapy group (P = .47). Grade 3 or higher serious adverse events were reported more often in the RFA group: 26 patients (27%) vs 10 patients (11%) (P = .004). Mean changes from baseline of -14.6, -12.0, and -18.4 were observed for the Global Health Status quality-of-life scores at 1, 3, and 18 months, respectively, numerically exceeding the threshold of 10 points for clinical relevance. In the chemotherapy-only group, mean changes from baseline on the Global Health Status remained below the threshold for clinical relevance. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This randomized clinical trial of patients with LAPC after 2 months of multiagent chemotherapy found that local ablative therapy with RFA did not improve survival compared with chemotherapy only and adversely affected patient's quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03690323.

Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.