Accessibility in Practice:A Socio-Technical Study of Human, Organizational, and Leadership Barriers in Software Development

Accessibility in software systems remains a persistent challenge, yet it is a simple necessity for equitable access to digital resources. This study investigates the human-centered and organizational barriers that influence accessibility adoption across diverse socio-technical contexts in Europe and Africa. Drawing on survey data from 130 software professionals, we explore how accessibility practices are shaped by leadership engagement, team collaboration, organizational culture, and policy contexts. The study reveals that, in both continents, accessibility is frequently deprioritized due to competing project demands, inadequate training, and weak organizational incentives. This is true observed even in responses from the European Union, despite it's established accessibility legislation. The results indicate that to improve accessibility, there is a need for coordinated interventions, in both Africa and Europe, at multiple levels beyond the use of AI, including policy alignment, leadership support, and team-level communication practices. Our findings emphasizing accessibility as a socio-technical outcome that emerges from the interactions between people, processes, and technology. The paper concludes with actionable recommendations for practitioners and educators seeking to integrate accessibility as a core principle of sustainable, inclusive software development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bristol Research (University of Bristol)
Published
2026-04-01
Primary Topic
Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accessibility in Practice:A Socio-Technical Study of Human, Organizational, and Leadership Barriers in Software Development

Mikhail Ola Adisa, Ruzanna Chitchyan, Larry Abdullai, Adewole Usman Rufai et al.
Bristol Research (University of Bristol)
Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
article

Accessibility in Practice:A Socio-Technical Study of Human, Organizational, and Leadership Barriers in Software Development

Mikhail Ola Adisa, Ruzanna Chitchyan, Larry Abdullai, Adewole Usman Rufai, Abiodun E. Afolayan, Oluwasefunmi Arogundade, Shola Oyedeji, Ayodeji Oluwatope, Bilal Bilal
article en

Abstract

Accessibility in software systems remains a persistent challenge, yet it is a simple necessity for equitable access to digital resources. This study investigates the human-centered and organizational barriers that influence accessibility adoption across diverse socio-technical contexts in Europe and Africa. Drawing on survey data from 130 software professionals, we explore how accessibility practices are shaped by leadership engagement, team collaboration, organizational culture, and policy contexts. The study reveals that, in both continents, accessibility is frequently deprioritized due to competing project demands, inadequate training, and weak organizational incentives. This is true observed even in responses from the European Union, despite it's established accessibility legislation. The results indicate that to improve accessibility, there is a need for coordinated interventions, in both Africa and Europe, at multiple levels beyond the use of AI, including policy alignment, leadership support, and team-level communication practices. Our findings emphasizing accessibility as a socio-technical outcome that emerges from the interactions between people, processes, and technology. The paper concludes with actionable recommendations for practitioners and educators seeking to integrate accessibility as a core principle of sustainable, inclusive software development.

Bristol Research (University of Bristol)
Ekiti State University (NG), Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta (NG), Tallinn University (EE), University of Lagos (NG), Adekunle Ajasin University (NG), Obafemi Awolowo University (NG), Cabot (United States) (US), Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.