Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Motility Diagnostics: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: The assessment of gastrointestinal (GI) motility disorders is limited by the invasive, resource-intensive, and subjective nature of current testing. Artificial Intelligence (AI) is being applied to address these challenges. This review aimed to comprehensively identify, appraise, and synthesize the spectrum of AI applications in GI motility diagnostics. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Medline for original studies was conducted in March 2025. Results were narratively synthesized and grouped by anatomic region. KEY RESULTS: Of 1383 articles, 90 primary studies met the inclusion criteria. In the esophagus (n = 31), the primary focus was automation of High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry (HREM), pH impedance, and Functional Luminal Imaging Probe (FLIP) panometry analysis. In the gastroduodenum (n = 21), studies looked to improve diagnostic accuracy and interpretability of legacy electrogastrography (EGG). In the small and large intestine (n = 19), AI was used to determine transit time and predict post-operative ileus. In the anorectum (n = 9), tools focused on standardizing manometry interpretation. Review of pan-GI applications (n = 10) highlighted AI's application to wireless capsule endoscopy and bowel sounds analysis. While promising, all areas need more rigorous research and external validation before widespread deployment. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: AI will play an essential role in improving and automating the interpretation of GI motility diagnostics. However, even the most promising models require large-scale prospective validation before clinical implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (ID: 1128662).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.70310
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Motility Diagnostics: A Systematic Review

Greg O'Grady, Chris Varghese, Dylan Muggleston, Christopher Andrews
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
article

Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Motility Diagnostics: A Systematic Review

Greg O'Grady, Chris Varghese, Dylan Muggleston, Christopher Andrews
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The assessment of gastrointestinal (GI) motility disorders is limited by the invasive, resource-intensive, and subjective nature of current testing. Artificial Intelligence (AI) is being applied to address these challenges. This review aimed to comprehensively identify, appraise, and synthesize the spectrum of AI applications in GI motility diagnostics. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Medline for original studies was conducted in March 2025. Results were narratively synthesized and grouped by anatomic region. KEY RESULTS: Of 1383 articles, 90 primary studies met the inclusion criteria. In the esophagus (n = 31), the primary focus was automation of High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry (HREM), pH impedance, and Functional Luminal Imaging Probe (FLIP) panometry analysis. In the gastroduodenum (n = 21), studies looked to improve diagnostic accuracy and interpretability of legacy electrogastrography (EGG). In the small and large intestine (n = 19), AI was used to determine transit time and predict post-operative ileus. In the anorectum (n = 9), tools focused on standardizing manometry interpretation. Review of pan-GI applications (n = 10) highlighted AI's application to wireless capsule endoscopy and bowel sounds analysis. While promising, all areas need more rigorous research and external validation before widespread deployment. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: AI will play an essential role in improving and automating the interpretation of GI motility diagnostics. However, even the most promising models require large-scale prospective validation before clinical implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (ID: 1128662).

Neurogastroenterology & MotilityVol. 38(4)
Mayo Clinic (US), University of Auckland (NZ), University of Calgary (CA), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
Health Research Council of New Zealand
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.