Applying the Best Interests Standard in Pediatric Palliative Care: A Case Study

The core ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice are not new topics of discussion in pediatric and adult medicine. However, these principles become far more complex in pediatrics, where parental authority must serve as a proxy for the child’s welfare. This case analysis examines the application of the Best Interests Standard (BIS) in pediatric palliative care through the story of a 9-year-old boy with relapsed metastatic medulloblastoma and significant social challenges. As the child’s condition declined and curative options were no longer beneficial, the ethical focus shifted from preserving future-oriented interests to meeting immediate experiential needs for comfort, safety, and relief of suffering. Resource limitations, notably in rural areas with scarce pediatric palliative services, intensified the ethical tensions and decision-making. This case illustrates how assessments of best interests evolve with changing clinical circumstances and why, near the end of life, comfort-focused care often becomes the most ethically appropriate option.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/nib.2026.a987828
Primary Topic
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Applying the Best Interests Standard in Pediatric Palliative Care: A Case Study

Cassidy Petrigac, Aloysius Ochasi
Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
article

Applying the Best Interests Standard in Pediatric Palliative Care: A Case Study

Cassidy Petrigac, Aloysius Ochasi
article en

Abstract

The core ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice are not new topics of discussion in pediatric and adult medicine. However, these principles become far more complex in pediatrics, where parental authority must serve as a proxy for the child’s welfare. This case analysis examines the application of the Best Interests Standard (BIS) in pediatric palliative care through the story of a 9-year-old boy with relapsed metastatic medulloblastoma and significant social challenges. As the child’s condition declined and curative options were no longer beneficial, the ethical focus shifted from preserving future-oriented interests to meeting immediate experiential needs for comfort, safety, and relief of suffering. Resource limitations, notably in rural areas with scarce pediatric palliative services, intensified the ethical tensions and decision-making. This case illustrates how assessments of best interests evolve with changing clinical circumstances and why, near the end of life, comfort-focused care often becomes the most ethically appropriate option.

Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.