The Contribution of Time Domain Structures to Electron Loss During the 17 March 2013 Geomagnetic Storm

Abstract Ring current modeling has been a subject of active research in the last two decades. However, accurately modeling of this population of particles remains a challenge. Several recent studies have demonstrated that ring current models can overestimate the trapped electron flux in the 10–50 keV range by up to two orders of magnitude during geomagnetic storms. This discrepancy can be attributed to an insufficient representation of electron loss processes, particularly the pitch‐angle scattering in the pre‐midnight sector. Time domain structures (TDS) can drive precipitation of electrons with energies of a few keV. In this study, we quantify TDS‐induced scattering during the 17 March 2013 geomagnetic storm and incorporate the corresponding electron lifetimes into the four‐dimensional Versatile near‐Earth environment of Radiation Belts and ring current (VERB‐4D) model. The TDS properties were derived from Van Allen Probes waveform observations and used to scale quasi‐linear diffusion coefficients. Our results show that, using the estimated upper bound of observed TDS electric field amplitudes, TDS can significantly contribute to the electron loss. Nevertheless, even under such favorable assumptions, TDS‐driven scattering alone cannot fully account for the electron loss that is inferred from the comparison with observations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025ja034872
Primary Topic
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Contribution of Time Domain Structures to Electron Loss During the 17 March 2013 Geomagnetic Storm

K. Stoll, Yuri Shprits, Bernhard Haas, Leonie Pick et al.
Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
article

The Contribution of Time Domain Structures to Electron Loss During the 17 March 2013 Geomagnetic Storm

K. Stoll, Yuri Shprits, Bernhard Haas, Leonie Pick, Yangyang Shen, Dedong Wang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Ring current modeling has been a subject of active research in the last two decades. However, accurately modeling of this population of particles remains a challenge. Several recent studies have demonstrated that ring current models can overestimate the trapped electron flux in the 10–50 keV range by up to two orders of magnitude during geomagnetic storms. This discrepancy can be attributed to an insufficient representation of electron loss processes, particularly the pitch‐angle scattering in the pre‐midnight sector. Time domain structures (TDS) can drive precipitation of electrons with energies of a few keV. In this study, we quantify TDS‐induced scattering during the 17 March 2013 geomagnetic storm and incorporate the corresponding electron lifetimes into the four‐dimensional Versatile near‐Earth environment of Radiation Belts and ring current (VERB‐4D) model. The TDS properties were derived from Van Allen Probes waveform observations and used to scale quasi‐linear diffusion coefficients. Our results show that, using the estimated upper bound of observed TDS electric field amplitudes, TDS can significantly contribute to the electron loss. Nevertheless, even under such favorable assumptions, TDS‐driven scattering alone cannot fully account for the electron loss that is inferred from the comparison with observations.

Journal of Geophysical Research Space PhysicsVol. 131(4)
Planetary Science Institute (US), University of Alberta (CA), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of Potsdam (DE), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE), GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.