Estimating the burden of imported malaria in the Asia Pacific region: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Imported malaria is a major barrier to achieve and sustain malaria elimination for countries in Asia Pacific. This systematic review and meta-analysis quantified the pooled prevalence of imported malaria in the region. METHODS: The systematic review and meta-analysis protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251008817). Three databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were used for literature search from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2024 for imported malaria in 22 Asia Pacific malaria eliminating countries. Pooled prevalence with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was calculated using an inverse variance random-effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias were also assessed. RESULTS: Based on 42 studies conducted in nine Asia Pacific countries with a total of 435,454 malaria cases, the pooled prevalence of imported malaria was 89.0% (95% CI: 75.9-95.5, I2-100%, n =166,412 imported cases). The pooled prevalence of imported malaria in males, Plasmodium falciparum, and origin from Africa was 94% (95% CI: 92.0-96.0, I2-97.5%, n = 70,619), 57.0% (95 % CI: 47.2-65.5, I2-99.5%, n=60,999), and 64.3% (95 % CI: 43.1-81.0, I2-99.5%, n = 67,511), respectively. The imported malaria varied by occupation with 53.0% (95% CI: 34.0 -71.0, I2-99.7%, n = 7,989) in labourer to 40.0% (95% CI: 15.0-72.0, I2-99.7%, n = 9,611) in farmers. The subgroup meta-analysis revealed pooled prevalence of 84.6% (95% CI: 68.3 - 93.3, I2 -100% n=154,792) in pre-elimination phase, and it ranged between 95.0% in Sri Lanka (95% CI: 13.0-100, n=761) and China (95% CI:85.8-98.0, n = 156,031) to 3.2% (95% CI: 2.87-3.47, n = 407) in South Korea. CONCLUSION: Imported malaria constitutes a significant proportion of malaria cases in Asia Pacific malaria eliminating countries. The findings highlight the critical need for strengthened cross border coordination for surveillance, and tailored interventions to achieve and sustain malaria elimination efforts in the region.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Travel Medicine
Published
2026-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jtm/taag022
Primary Topic
Malaria Research and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating the burden of imported malaria in the Asia Pacific region: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Nasser Bagheri, Kinley Wangdi, Manas Kotepui, Tsheten Tsheten et al.
Journal of Travel Medicine
Malaria Research and Control
article

Estimating the burden of imported malaria in the Asia Pacific region: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Nasser Bagheri, Kinley Wangdi, Manas Kotepui, Tsheten Tsheten, Binay Thapa, Soumya Mazumdar, Kinley Penjor
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Imported malaria is a major barrier to achieve and sustain malaria elimination for countries in Asia Pacific. This systematic review and meta-analysis quantified the pooled prevalence of imported malaria in the region. METHODS: The systematic review and meta-analysis protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251008817). Three databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were used for literature search from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2024 for imported malaria in 22 Asia Pacific malaria eliminating countries. Pooled prevalence with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was calculated using an inverse variance random-effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias were also assessed. RESULTS: Based on 42 studies conducted in nine Asia Pacific countries with a total of 435,454 malaria cases, the pooled prevalence of imported malaria was 89.0% (95% CI: 75.9-95.5, I2-100%, n =166,412 imported cases). The pooled prevalence of imported malaria in males, Plasmodium falciparum, and origin from Africa was 94% (95% CI: 92.0-96.0, I2-97.5%, n = 70,619), 57.0% (95 % CI: 47.2-65.5, I2-99.5%, n=60,999), and 64.3% (95 % CI: 43.1-81.0, I2-99.5%, n = 67,511), respectively. The imported malaria varied by occupation with 53.0% (95% CI: 34.0 -71.0, I2-99.7%, n = 7,989) in labourer to 40.0% (95% CI: 15.0-72.0, I2-99.7%, n = 9,611) in farmers. The subgroup meta-analysis revealed pooled prevalence of 84.6% (95% CI: 68.3 - 93.3, I2 -100% n=154,792) in pre-elimination phase, and it ranged between 95.0% in Sri Lanka (95% CI: 13.0-100, n=761) and China (95% CI:85.8-98.0, n = 156,031) to 3.2% (95% CI: 2.87-3.47, n = 407) in South Korea. CONCLUSION: Imported malaria constitutes a significant proportion of malaria cases in Asia Pacific malaria eliminating countries. The findings highlight the critical need for strengthened cross border coordination for surveillance, and tailored interventions to achieve and sustain malaria elimination efforts in the region.

Journal of Travel Medicine
Nakhon Phanom University (TH), Australian National University (AU), University of Canberra (AU), Act Health (AU), Royal University of Bhutan (BT)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Malaria Research and Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.