Deep Learning-based Prediction of Acute Pancreatitis Severity From Abdominal CT With Multicenter External Validation

Abstract Background Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common gastrointestinal disease with a rising global incidence. While most cases are mild, severe AP (SAP) carries high mortality. Early and accurate severity prediction facilitates management optimization. However, existing clinical severity prediction models, such as Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP) and Modified CT Severity Index (mCTSI), have modest accuracy and often rely on data unavailable at admission. Purpose This study proposes a deep learning (DL) model to predict AP severity using abdominal contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) scans acquired within 24 hours of admission. Materials and Methods We collected 10,130 studies from 8,335 patients across a multi-site U.S. health system and 3,488 studies from public datasets. The DL model was trained in two stages: (1) self-supervised pretraining on 11,896 unlabeled studies and (2) fine-tuning on 550 labeled studies. Performance was evaluated against mCTSI on a hold-out internal test set (n = 100 patients) and against both mCTSI and BISAP on an external Hungarian acute pancreatitis registry (n = 518 patients). Results On the internal test set, the model achieved AUROCs of 0.888 (95% CI: 0.800–0.960, sensitivity 0.50, specificity 0.92) for SAP and 0.888 (95% CI: 0.819–0.946, sensitivity 0.75, specificity 0.85) for mild AP (MAP), outperforming mCTSI (p = 0.002). External validation showed AUROCs of 0.887 (95% CI: 0.825–0.941, sensitivity 0.73, specificity 0.88) for SAP and 0.858 (95% CI: 0.826–0.888, sensitivity 0.38, specificity 0.98) for MAP, surpassing mCTSI (p = 0.024) and BISAP (p = 0.002). In retrospective triage analysis, the model correctly identified 50–73% of patients who progressed to SAP and 40–73% of those with MAP. Conclusion The proposed DL model achieved performance comparable to or better than established prognostic tools and maintained robust external performance. These findings suggest that AI-assisted CT analysis may support early, automated risk stratification of AP.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiology Advances
Published
2026-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/radadv/umag020
Primary Topic
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep Learning-based Prediction of Acute Pancreatitis Severity From Abdominal CT With Multicenter External Validation

Yiqiu Shen, Ryan Cummings, Qi Lei, Chenchan Huang et al.
Radiology Advances
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
article

Deep Learning-based Prediction of Acute Pancreatitis Severity From Abdominal CT With Multicenter External Validation

Yiqiu Shen, Ryan Cummings, Qi Lei, Chenchan Huang, Yanqi Xu, Péter Hegedűs, Dorottya Molnár, Wan Fung Chui, Edwin Mathieu, Julia E. Goldberg, Isabella Mary DeGregorio, Nándor Faluhelyi, István Szabó, Belinda Appiah Asare, Weicheng Zeng, Shikhar Rastogi, Kriszta-Beata Gurza, Hedvig Tarjan, Áron Vincze, Emmy Yuebi Hu, Péter Hegyi, Tamas Gonda, Katalin Márta, Benjamin I Richter, Yang Hu, Brigitta Teutsch, Andrea Szentesi, Ruben Borbély
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common gastrointestinal disease with a rising global incidence. While most cases are mild, severe AP (SAP) carries high mortality. Early and accurate severity prediction facilitates management optimization. However, existing clinical severity prediction models, such as Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP) and Modified CT Severity Index (mCTSI), have modest accuracy and often rely on data unavailable at admission. Purpose This study proposes a deep learning (DL) model to predict AP severity using abdominal contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) scans acquired within 24 hours of admission. Materials and Methods We collected 10,130 studies from 8,335 patients across a multi-site U.S. health system and 3,488 studies from public datasets. The DL model was trained in two stages: (1) self-supervised pretraining on 11,896 unlabeled studies and (2) fine-tuning on 550 labeled studies. Performance was evaluated against mCTSI on a hold-out internal test set (n = 100 patients) and against both mCTSI and BISAP on an external Hungarian acute pancreatitis registry (n = 518 patients). Results On the internal test set, the model achieved AUROCs of 0.888 (95% CI: 0.800–0.960, sensitivity 0.50, specificity 0.92) for SAP and 0.888 (95% CI: 0.819–0.946, sensitivity 0.75, specificity 0.85) for mild AP (MAP), outperforming mCTSI (p = 0.002). External validation showed AUROCs of 0.887 (95% CI: 0.825–0.941, sensitivity 0.73, specificity 0.88) for SAP and 0.858 (95% CI: 0.826–0.888, sensitivity 0.38, specificity 0.98) for MAP, surpassing mCTSI (p = 0.024) and BISAP (p = 0.002). In retrospective triage analysis, the model correctly identified 50–73% of patients who progressed to SAP and 40–73% of those with MAP. Conclusion The proposed DL model achieved performance comparable to or better than established prognostic tools and maintained robust external performance. These findings suggest that AI-assisted CT analysis may support early, automated risk stratification of AP.

Radiology Advances
Semmelweis University (HU), Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), University of Szeged (HU), NYU Langone Health (US), Cooper Medical School of Rowan University (US), Individual Differences (US), Bajcsy-Zsilinszky Kórház és Rendelőintézet (HU), New York University (US), University of Pecs (HU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.