FROM CONNECTIVISM TO EDUCATION 5.0: PHILOSOPHICAL, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL FOUNDATIONS

This study investigates the evolution of educational conceptions in the face of contemporary technological and sociocultural transformations. It analyzes Education 4.0, characterized by the intense incorporation of digital technologies into teaching, and Education 5.0, which proposes the integration of these resources into humanized and learner-centered pedagogical practices. Using a framework that combines philosophical, historical, social, and cultural foundations, the study also examines the influence of Connectivism Theory as a theoretical support for both models. The research, qualitative and descriptive in nature, was based on a bibliographic survey of national and international databases, encompassing classic and contemporary authors. The analysis was conducted through a comparison between the two educational proposals and the ways in which Connectivism articulates with each, highlighting points of convergence and divergence. The results indicate that, while Education 4.0 emphasizes technological efficiency and preparation for the digitized job market, Education 5.0 seeks to balance innovation and integral human development. It is concluded that incorporating connectivist perspectives offers the potential to build more collaborative, adaptive, and culturally sensitive educational experiences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19417171
Primary Topic
Educational Leadership and Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FROM CONNECTIVISM TO EDUCATION 5.0: PHILOSOPHICAL, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL FOUNDATIONS

Alaide Palagano Ferreira
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Educational Leadership and Innovation
article

FROM CONNECTIVISM TO EDUCATION 5.0: PHILOSOPHICAL, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL FOUNDATIONS

Alaide Palagano Ferreira
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the evolution of educational conceptions in the face of contemporary technological and sociocultural transformations. It analyzes Education 4.0, characterized by the intense incorporation of digital technologies into teaching, and Education 5.0, which proposes the integration of these resources into humanized and learner-centered pedagogical practices. Using a framework that combines philosophical, historical, social, and cultural foundations, the study also examines the influence of Connectivism Theory as a theoretical support for both models. The research, qualitative and descriptive in nature, was based on a bibliographic survey of national and international databases, encompassing classic and contemporary authors. The analysis was conducted through a comparison between the two educational proposals and the ways in which Connectivism articulates with each, highlighting points of convergence and divergence. The results indicate that, while Education 4.0 emphasizes technological efficiency and preparation for the digitized job market, Education 5.0 seeks to balance innovation and integral human development. It is concluded that incorporating connectivist perspectives offers the potential to build more collaborative, adaptive, and culturally sensitive educational experiences.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Universidad de la Integración de las Américas (PY)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Educational Leadership and Innovation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.