Understanding remote workers' job demands and resources and their implications for well‐ and ill‐being: Development and validation of a new measure

Abstract Drawing on the Job Demands‐Resources model, this mixed‐methods research aimed to better understand the nature, measurement, and psychological implications of remote work job demands and resources. Relying on a qualitative approach and on the existing literature, Study 1 allowed the identification and conceptualization of job demands and resources frequently experienced by remote workers. Studies 2 to 4 relied on quantitative cross‐sectional designs to test the structural, criterion, discriminant, and incremental validity of the French and English versions of the Remote work Job Demands and Resources‐Questionnaire (RJDR‐Q). Results provided support for a final 30‐item version measuring 10 remote work job demands (i.e., extended availability expectations, communication problems, social isolation, technological hassles, and personal interruptions) and resources (i.e., schedule flexibility, focused work, effective virtual communication, time‐saving, and functionality of the remote work environment). Furthermore, findings revealed that these remote work job demands and resources (1) had significant associations with remote workers' psychological health and work–home experiences, (2) were, overall, weakly correlated with general job demands and resources, and (3) explained remote workers' functioning over and above general job demands and resources. Altogether, this research enriches our understanding of employees' subjective experience of remote work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Psychology
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.70076
Primary Topic
Work-Family Balance Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding remote workers' job demands and resources and their implications for well‐ and ill‐being: Development and validation of a new measure

Tiphaine Huyghebaert‐Zouaghi, Claude Fernet, Jérémy Thomas, Sophie Berjot
Applied Psychology
Work-Family Balance Challenges
article

Understanding remote workers' job demands and resources and their implications for well‐ and ill‐being: Development and validation of a new measure

Tiphaine Huyghebaert‐Zouaghi, Claude Fernet, Jérémy Thomas, Sophie Berjot
article en

Abstract

Abstract Drawing on the Job Demands‐Resources model, this mixed‐methods research aimed to better understand the nature, measurement, and psychological implications of remote work job demands and resources. Relying on a qualitative approach and on the existing literature, Study 1 allowed the identification and conceptualization of job demands and resources frequently experienced by remote workers. Studies 2 to 4 relied on quantitative cross‐sectional designs to test the structural, criterion, discriminant, and incremental validity of the French and English versions of the Remote work Job Demands and Resources‐Questionnaire (RJDR‐Q). Results provided support for a final 30‐item version measuring 10 remote work job demands (i.e., extended availability expectations, communication problems, social isolation, technological hassles, and personal interruptions) and resources (i.e., schedule flexibility, focused work, effective virtual communication, time‐saving, and functionality of the remote work environment). Furthermore, findings revealed that these remote work job demands and resources (1) had significant associations with remote workers' psychological health and work–home experiences, (2) were, overall, weakly correlated with general job demands and resources, and (3) explained remote workers' functioning over and above general job demands and resources. Altogether, this research enriches our understanding of employees' subjective experience of remote work.

Applied PsychologyVol. 75(2)
Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (CA), Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne (FR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Work-Family Balance Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.