Interior Models of Mercury and Conditions for Iron Snow Formation in a Fe‐S‐Si Core

Abstract Mercury's unique interior structure and magnetic field generation remain to be fully understood. We construct models to further constrain Mercury's interior and test the hypothesis that iron snow within the liquid core drives the dynamo. We build upon previous models by incorporating an updated iron‐sulfur‐silicon (Fe‐S‐Si) core alloy composition and use a Monte Carlo approach to explore the parameter space consistent with geodetic and geophysical constraints. A high normalized moment of inertia (MoI) of , in combination with thermal and geochemical constraints, favors models with an Earth‐like mantle density of kg/, an inner core km in radius, and a core silicon content of at least 6 wt%. In contrast, a lower value of MoI favors models with lower mantle densities of kg/, an inner core radius in the range of 850–1,450 km, and a core silicon content less than 8 wt%. We also show that the formation of iron snow requires a sulfur concentration greater than wt%. However, the expected geochemistry of the core restricts the sulfur content to less than 2 wt%. This inconsistency suggests the absence of snow layers in Mercury's present‐day core and that its dynamo is not driven by sulfur‐induced iron crystallization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Planets
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025je009368
Primary Topic
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interior Models of Mercury and Conditions for Iron Snow Formation in a Fe‐S‐Si Core

Attilio Rivoldini, Dunyu Liu, K. M. Soderlund, Mathieu Dumberry et al.
Journal of Geophysical Research Planets
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
article

Interior Models of Mercury and Conditions for Iron Snow Formation in a Fe‐S‐Si Core

Attilio Rivoldini, Dunyu Liu, K. M. Soderlund, Mathieu Dumberry, Abigail H. Dunnigan, Gregor B. Steinbrügge
article en

Abstract

Abstract Mercury's unique interior structure and magnetic field generation remain to be fully understood. We construct models to further constrain Mercury's interior and test the hypothesis that iron snow within the liquid core drives the dynamo. We build upon previous models by incorporating an updated iron‐sulfur‐silicon (Fe‐S‐Si) core alloy composition and use a Monte Carlo approach to explore the parameter space consistent with geodetic and geophysical constraints. A high normalized moment of inertia (MoI) of , in combination with thermal and geochemical constraints, favors models with an Earth‐like mantle density of kg/, an inner core km in radius, and a core silicon content of at least 6 wt%. In contrast, a lower value of MoI favors models with lower mantle densities of kg/, an inner core radius in the range of 850–1,450 km, and a core silicon content less than 8 wt%. We also show that the formation of iron snow requires a sulfur concentration greater than wt%. However, the expected geochemistry of the core restricts the sulfur content to less than 2 wt%. This inconsistency suggests the absence of snow layers in Mercury's present‐day core and that its dynamo is not driven by sulfur‐induced iron crystallization.

Journal of Geophysical Research PlanetsVol. 131(4)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Planetary Science Institute (US), Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US), University of Alberta (CA), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Royal Observatory of Belgium (BE), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Belgian Federal Science Policy Office, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.