Pain Medicine and the Opioid Crisis: Time to Own Our Responsibility!

Pain remains a major unmet health need. Rising opioid prescribing has not reduced population pain and has directly contributed to increased morbidity and mortality. Opioid use disorder (OUD) and pain frequently coexist. Many people with OUD experience acute and chronic pain and a substantial proportion of patients prescribed opioids develop OUD. We have contributed to this problem. In this Position Paper, we defend the idea that we must urgently redefine pain medicine as a frontline discipline in opioid use disorder prevention and recovery. Pain management must be reframed as part of the solution for people with or at risk of OUD. Core principles include: early identification of OUD and psychiatric comorbidity, routine incorporation of trauma-informed, stigma-reducing communication and shared decision-making; continuation of opioid agonist therapy during acute care; use of tailored multimodal, opioid-sparing analgesia; and perioperative planning with addiction and primary care follow-up. At a system level, we recommend multidisciplinary opioid stewardship, clear limits on opioid indication, dose and duration, diversion-mitigation strategies and policy changes such as reduced pack sizes and limiting indications for prolonged-released opioids. Research priorities include qualitative studies of lived experience, inclusion of patient-reported outcomes in trials and big-data analyses of prescribing to identify targets for intervention. Integrating clinical best practice, stigma-aware care and system reforms can reduce harm while ensuring equitable, effective pain relief for people with pain and those with or at risk of OUD. SIGNIFICANCE: This position paper synthesises clinical, psychosocial and system-level strategies to manage pain in people with or at risk of OUD. It emphasises our unique responsibility by learning from failures, and constructively sees the future. Treatment continuity, trauma-informed and stigma-reducing communication, integrated care, interdisciplinary coordination and opioid stewardship policies are no longer optional. These recommendations aim to reduce harms, improve pain and mental-health outcomes and guide clinicians and policymakers toward better and more equitable care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Pain
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.70263
Primary Topic
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pain Medicine and the Opioid Crisis: Time to Own Our Responsibility!

Duncan T. Ritchie, Patrice Forget
European Journal of Pain
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
article

Pain Medicine and the Opioid Crisis: Time to Own Our Responsibility!

Duncan T. Ritchie, Patrice Forget
article en

Abstract

Pain remains a major unmet health need. Rising opioid prescribing has not reduced population pain and has directly contributed to increased morbidity and mortality. Opioid use disorder (OUD) and pain frequently coexist. Many people with OUD experience acute and chronic pain and a substantial proportion of patients prescribed opioids develop OUD. We have contributed to this problem. In this Position Paper, we defend the idea that we must urgently redefine pain medicine as a frontline discipline in opioid use disorder prevention and recovery. Pain management must be reframed as part of the solution for people with or at risk of OUD. Core principles include: early identification of OUD and psychiatric comorbidity, routine incorporation of trauma-informed, stigma-reducing communication and shared decision-making; continuation of opioid agonist therapy during acute care; use of tailored multimodal, opioid-sparing analgesia; and perioperative planning with addiction and primary care follow-up. At a system level, we recommend multidisciplinary opioid stewardship, clear limits on opioid indication, dose and duration, diversion-mitigation strategies and policy changes such as reduced pack sizes and limiting indications for prolonged-released opioids. Research priorities include qualitative studies of lived experience, inclusion of patient-reported outcomes in trials and big-data analyses of prescribing to identify targets for intervention. Integrating clinical best practice, stigma-aware care and system reforms can reduce harm while ensuring equitable, effective pain relief for people with pain and those with or at risk of OUD. SIGNIFICANCE: This position paper synthesises clinical, psychosocial and system-level strategies to manage pain in people with or at risk of OUD. It emphasises our unique responsibility by learning from failures, and constructively sees the future. Treatment continuity, trauma-informed and stigma-reducing communication, integrated care, interdisciplinary coordination and opioid stewardship policies are no longer optional. These recommendations aim to reduce harms, improve pain and mental-health outcomes and guide clinicians and policymakers toward better and more equitable care.

European Journal of PainVol. 30(4)
University of Aberdeen (GB), Université de Montpellier (FR), NHS Grampian (GB), European Society of Anaesthesiology (BE), European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (BE), Université de Nîmes (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.