Proximal Anastomotic New Entry Tear Following Surgical Repair of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: Anatomical Location, Risk Factors, and Impact on Long-Term Outcomes

OBJECTIVES: Proximal anastomotic new entry tear (PANE) after surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) remains poorly characterized. This study aimed to determine the incidence, anatomical distribution, perioperative risk factors, and long-term impact of PANE. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 532 consecutive patients who underwent open aortic repair for ATAAD at our institution between 2003 and 2023. Patients without postoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) or those who underwent root procedures were excluded. PANE was defined as true-false lumen communication or pseudoaneurysm formation at the proximal anastomosis on CT. Risk factors were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Long-term outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Fine-Gray competing risk analyses. RESULTS: The final study cohort included 425 patients; PANE occurred in 50 (11.8%), predominantly at the noncoronary sinus (70% isolated, 88% including adjacent sinuses) and colocalized with preoperative dissection sites in 96% of cases. Independent risk factors were preoperative severe aortic regurgitation (OR 3.69, 95% CI 1.23-11.1, P = .020) and surgery by less experienced surgeons (OR 3.75, 95% CI 1.53-9.23, P = .004), whereas biological glue use was protective (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.19-0.70, P = .002). Long-term survival was not significantly different between groups (P = .086). PANE significantly increased proximal reoperation risk (10-year cumulative incidence 14.2% vs 2.2%; subdistribution HR 8.39, 95% CI 3.35-21.0, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: PANE affected 12% of ATAAD repairs and significantly increased reoperation risk without affecting survival. Prevention may require experienced surgical teams and optimized anastomotic techniques. All patients warrant early postoperative CT imaging to aid identification and guide surveillance strategies. CLINICAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 4667.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezag144
Primary Topic
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proximal Anastomotic New Entry Tear Following Surgical Repair of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: Anatomical Location, Risk Factors, and Impact on Long-Term Outcomes

Go Yamashita, Shingo Hirao, Tatsuhiko Komiya, Koh Yaegashi et al.
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
article

Proximal Anastomotic New Entry Tear Following Surgical Repair of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: Anatomical Location, Risk Factors, and Impact on Long-Term Outcomes

Go Yamashita, Shingo Hirao, Tatsuhiko Komiya, Koh Yaegashi, Shoya Nakano, Takumi Takauchi
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Proximal anastomotic new entry tear (PANE) after surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) remains poorly characterized. This study aimed to determine the incidence, anatomical distribution, perioperative risk factors, and long-term impact of PANE. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 532 consecutive patients who underwent open aortic repair for ATAAD at our institution between 2003 and 2023. Patients without postoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) or those who underwent root procedures were excluded. PANE was defined as true-false lumen communication or pseudoaneurysm formation at the proximal anastomosis on CT. Risk factors were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Long-term outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Fine-Gray competing risk analyses. RESULTS: The final study cohort included 425 patients; PANE occurred in 50 (11.8%), predominantly at the noncoronary sinus (70% isolated, 88% including adjacent sinuses) and colocalized with preoperative dissection sites in 96% of cases. Independent risk factors were preoperative severe aortic regurgitation (OR 3.69, 95% CI 1.23-11.1, P = .020) and surgery by less experienced surgeons (OR 3.75, 95% CI 1.53-9.23, P = .004), whereas biological glue use was protective (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.19-0.70, P = .002). Long-term survival was not significantly different between groups (P = .086). PANE significantly increased proximal reoperation risk (10-year cumulative incidence 14.2% vs 2.2%; subdistribution HR 8.39, 95% CI 3.35-21.0, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: PANE affected 12% of ATAAD repairs and significantly increased reoperation risk without affecting survival. Prevention may require experienced surgical teams and optimized anastomotic techniques. All patients warrant early postoperative CT imaging to aid identification and guide surveillance strategies. CLINICAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 4667.

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic SurgeryVol. 68(4)
Kurashiki Central Hospital (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.