Circulating EMID2 as a Prognostic Biomarker of Poor Outcomes in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Background: EMID1 and EMID2 (also known as type XXVI collagen) are extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins that belong to the EDEN gene superfamily. Both proteins feature EMI domains, implicating them in protein-protein interactions and ECM remodeling. Despite structural similarities EMID1 and EMID2 have distinct functions with EMID1 primarily expressed in epithelial cells and EMID2 in mesenchymal cells. Previous studies have shown that while EMID1 could promote metastasis EMID2 might inhibit tumor growth and dissemination. Objectives: Little is known about the specific functions and mechanisms of EMID1 and EMID2 in tumor development. Therefore, this study aims to explore the biomarker potential of EMID 1 and EMID2 in cancer. Design: Retrospective study including a cross-sectional and a prognostic cohort to evaluate the biomarker potential of EMID1 and EMID2 in cancer. Methods: We developed 2 competitive ELISAs targeting the N-terminal of EMID1 and EMID2. We compared EMID1 and EMID2 levels in serum from patients with different types of cancer (n = 216) to levels in healthy controls (n = 33). Thereafter, we measured EMID1 and EMID2 levels in a second cohort of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC; n = 212) in stage IV treated with chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab. Results: = .031). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no association between low or high levels of EMID1 or EMID2 and overall survival (OS). Conclusion: This study highlights EMID2 as prognostic biomarker in patients with mCRC, where higher levels correlated with more aggressive disease and shorter PFS. Future research should focus on elucidating the mechanisms underlying EMID2 degradation and its implications in cancer progression. Although EMID1 did not show diagnostic or prognostic value in this study, its biomarker potential in other types of cancer or benign diseases warrants further investigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomarker Insights
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/11772719261436895
Primary Topic
Cell Adhesion Molecules Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Circulating EMID2 as a Prognostic Biomarker of Poor Outcomes in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Maria Liljefors, Mogens K. Boisen, Nicholas Willumsen, Julia S. Johansen et al.
Biomarker Insights
Cell Adhesion Molecules Research
article

Circulating EMID2 as a Prognostic Biomarker of Poor Outcomes in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Maria Liljefors, Mogens K. Boisen, Nicholas Willumsen, Julia S. Johansen, Sine Rosendal Syversen, Morten A. Karsdal, Marina Crespo-Bravo, Jeppe Thorlacius-Ussing
article en

Abstract

Background: EMID1 and EMID2 (also known as type XXVI collagen) are extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins that belong to the EDEN gene superfamily. Both proteins feature EMI domains, implicating them in protein-protein interactions and ECM remodeling. Despite structural similarities EMID1 and EMID2 have distinct functions with EMID1 primarily expressed in epithelial cells and EMID2 in mesenchymal cells. Previous studies have shown that while EMID1 could promote metastasis EMID2 might inhibit tumor growth and dissemination. Objectives: Little is known about the specific functions and mechanisms of EMID1 and EMID2 in tumor development. Therefore, this study aims to explore the biomarker potential of EMID 1 and EMID2 in cancer. Design: Retrospective study including a cross-sectional and a prognostic cohort to evaluate the biomarker potential of EMID1 and EMID2 in cancer. Methods: We developed 2 competitive ELISAs targeting the N-terminal of EMID1 and EMID2. We compared EMID1 and EMID2 levels in serum from patients with different types of cancer (n = 216) to levels in healthy controls (n = 33). Thereafter, we measured EMID1 and EMID2 levels in a second cohort of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC; n = 212) in stage IV treated with chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab. Results: = .031). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no association between low or high levels of EMID1 or EMID2 and overall survival (OS). Conclusion: This study highlights EMID2 as prognostic biomarker in patients with mCRC, where higher levels correlated with more aggressive disease and shorter PFS. Future research should focus on elucidating the mechanisms underlying EMID2 degradation and its implications in cancer progression. Although EMID1 did not show diagnostic or prognostic value in this study, its biomarker potential in other types of cancer or benign diseases warrants further investigation.

Biomarker InsightsVol. 21
University of Copenhagen (DK), Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Gentofte Hospital (DK), Nordic Bioscience (Denmark) (DK)
Gentofte Hospital
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Cell Adhesion Molecules Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.