Construction and Validation of Multi-Omics Predictive Models for Colorectal Cancer Using Machine-Learning Approaches

Zhenhuan Lu,1,* Xiaowen Li,1,* Zhiping Liang,1 Xiaocong Zhang,1 Yiyan Tan,1 Yinglan Kuang,2 Kang Li,1 Xiaofeng Zhu1 1Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Yuebei People’s Hospital, Shaoguan City, Guangdong Province, People’s Republic of China; 2A.I. R&D Center, Zhuhai Hengqin Sanmed Aitech Ltd., Zhuhai City, Guangdong Province, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Xiaofeng Zhu, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Yuebei People’s Hospital, No. 133 Huimin South Road, Wujiang District, Shaoguan City, Guangdong Province, 512000, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-07518101207, Email [email protected] Kang Li, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Yuebei People’s Hospital, No. 133 Huimin South Road, Wujiang District, Shaoguan City, Guangdong Province, 512000, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected]: To construct and externally validate a multi-omics nomogram that uses only routine clinicopathological variables to predict tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI), NTRK/PIK3CA mutation status and overall survival (OS) in colorectal cancer (CRC).Methods: TCGA data (n=398) served as the training set and 120 consecutive CRC patients who underwent radical resection at Yuebei People’s Hospital formed the prospective validation set. After z-score normalization, 21demographic, clinical and pathological features were screened for multicollinearity (VIF< 5) and redundancy via least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression with 10-fold cross-validation. Optimal hyper-parameters for each algorithm were tuned by nested 10-fold grid search. Four machine-learning algorithms, logistic regression (LR), support-vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT) and random forest (RF), were compared by area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC), F1 score and decision-curve analysis. The best model was externally validated and calibrated with bootstrapping.Results: The results showed that the TMB prediction model included in the MSI index had the best power when constructed by the RF method, with an area under the ROC curve value of 0.9597. For the MSI state prediction model which includes three indicators of TMB, had the best power when constructed by RF method, with AUC value of 0.8225. The NTRK and PIK3CA gene status prediction model, which included three indicators of TMB and MSI status, had the best power when constructed using the RF method.Conclusion: The prediction model constructed in this study can help clinicians quickly identify high-risk patients and provide a basis for formulating a reasonable treatment plan. Further optimization of the model and expansion of the sample size are required to verify its power in the future. Keywords: colorectal cancer, clinical prediction, TMB, MSI