Staffing Trends Amid Boarding Challenges: A Five‐Year Analysis (2019–2023)

OBJECTIVES: To examine trends in clinician staffing in the context of rising Emergency Department (ED) boarding we describe five-year national trends (2019-2023) in boarding hours, attending physician and PA/NP coverage, and hospitalist and nursing support across a multicenter cohort of U.S. EDs. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the Association of Academic Chairs of Emergency Medicine (AACEM) and Academy of Administrators in Academic Emergency Medicine (AAAEM) annual benchmarking survey for academic years 2019 through 2023. The analysis included primary academic, academic affiliate, and community affiliate EDs. Boarding hours, attending physician and PA/NP hours, nursing support, and hospitalist care for patients boarding were evaluated over time. Outcomes were stratified by hospital classification. RESULTS: 63 EDs were included in our analysis. Median boarding hours/day increased 61.1% from 206.36 (IQR 89.87, 373.11) to 332.47 (137.43, 548.09) (p = 0.01), while median attending hours remained stable over this time frame from 72.00 (53.90, 91.50) to 72.00 (56.00, 88.00) (p = 0.56). The boarding-to-attending hour ratio increased 55.6% overall from 2.97 (1.33, 4.04) to 4.62 (2.15, 7.42) (p = 0.002). Hospitals providing nursing support for boarders increased 53.6% (95% CI 3.20%, 134.40%) which was statistically significant, whereas hospitalist management of boarding patients increased 28.7% (95% CI 2.60%, 68.10%) which was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: ED boarding hours increased substantially over the study period without a proportionate rise in attending staffing, resulting in a marked increase in boarding burden per physician hour. While some hospitals provided funding for increased nursing and hospital coverage to care for boarding patients, these measures have not kept pace with rising boarding demands. These findings highlight a growing mismatch between workload and staffing, underscoring the need for updated staffing models and system-level strategies to address the operational and clinical challenges of ED boarding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Academic Emergency Medicine
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.70281
Primary Topic
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Staffing Trends Amid Boarding Challenges: A Five‐Year Analysis (2019–2023)

David Chartash, Mary Tanski, J. Brice, Rohit B. Sangal et al.
Academic Emergency Medicine
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
article

Staffing Trends Amid Boarding Challenges: A Five‐Year Analysis (2019–2023)

David Chartash, Mary Tanski, J. Brice, Rohit B. Sangal, Mitchell Blenden, Alyssa Tyransky, Gregory M. Archual, Suresh K. Pavuluri, Rohini Ghosh, Arjun K. Venkatesh
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine trends in clinician staffing in the context of rising Emergency Department (ED) boarding we describe five-year national trends (2019-2023) in boarding hours, attending physician and PA/NP coverage, and hospitalist and nursing support across a multicenter cohort of U.S. EDs. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the Association of Academic Chairs of Emergency Medicine (AACEM) and Academy of Administrators in Academic Emergency Medicine (AAAEM) annual benchmarking survey for academic years 2019 through 2023. The analysis included primary academic, academic affiliate, and community affiliate EDs. Boarding hours, attending physician and PA/NP hours, nursing support, and hospitalist care for patients boarding were evaluated over time. Outcomes were stratified by hospital classification. RESULTS: 63 EDs were included in our analysis. Median boarding hours/day increased 61.1% from 206.36 (IQR 89.87, 373.11) to 332.47 (137.43, 548.09) (p = 0.01), while median attending hours remained stable over this time frame from 72.00 (53.90, 91.50) to 72.00 (56.00, 88.00) (p = 0.56). The boarding-to-attending hour ratio increased 55.6% overall from 2.97 (1.33, 4.04) to 4.62 (2.15, 7.42) (p = 0.002). Hospitals providing nursing support for boarders increased 53.6% (95% CI 3.20%, 134.40%) which was statistically significant, whereas hospitalist management of boarding patients increased 28.7% (95% CI 2.60%, 68.10%) which was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: ED boarding hours increased substantially over the study period without a proportionate rise in attending staffing, resulting in a marked increase in boarding burden per physician hour. While some hospitals provided funding for increased nursing and hospital coverage to care for boarding patients, these measures have not kept pace with rising boarding demands. These findings highlight a growing mismatch between workload and staffing, underscoring the need for updated staffing models and system-level strategies to address the operational and clinical challenges of ED boarding.

Academic Emergency MedicineVol. 33(4)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Oregon Health & Science University (US), Yale University (US), The Ohio State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.