The Politics of Pro‐Poor Policies in the Global South

This thematic issue on the politics of pro-poor policies in the Global South brings together 13 articles that centre on the importance of institutionalist analysis. We emphasise several institutional dimensions that are particularly important in relation to pro-poor policies: processes of social ordering and social reproduction, the exercise of power, mechanisms of rule, and notions and practices of citizenship and rights. Accordingly, in our call for papers, we identified four major sub-themes within this broader framing that hold particular importance for pro-poor policies and the outcomes of those policies: (a) different types of legal mechanisms, (b) the power, interests, and ideologies of rivalling political actors, (c) the constraints and potential solutions of institutional configurations, and (d) the evolution and diffusion of the pro-poor agenda. In working off these sub-themes, the collection of articles reveal several recurrent insights, such as the dysfunctionalities of targeting systems in most of the Global South; the fragmentation and incoherence that is typical of social protection and related policies and programmes; the tensions involved in donor promotion, oversight, and monitoring of social protection programmes; related to this, the contestations between popular universalistic aspirations versus the narrow residualism of programmes promoted by donors; and the fundamentally political ways that “pro-poor” policy is envisaged.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Politics and Governance
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.12470
Primary Topic
Human Rights and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Politics of Pro‐Poor Policies in the Global South

Markus Kaltenborn, Wil Hout, Andrew M. Fischer
Politics and Governance
Human Rights and Development
article

The Politics of Pro‐Poor Policies in the Global South

Markus Kaltenborn, Wil Hout, Andrew M. Fischer
article en

Abstract

This thematic issue on the politics of pro-poor policies in the Global South brings together 13 articles that centre on the importance of institutionalist analysis. We emphasise several institutional dimensions that are particularly important in relation to pro-poor policies: processes of social ordering and social reproduction, the exercise of power, mechanisms of rule, and notions and practices of citizenship and rights. Accordingly, in our call for papers, we identified four major sub-themes within this broader framing that hold particular importance for pro-poor policies and the outcomes of those policies: (a) different types of legal mechanisms, (b) the power, interests, and ideologies of rivalling political actors, (c) the constraints and potential solutions of institutional configurations, and (d) the evolution and diffusion of the pro-poor agenda. In working off these sub-themes, the collection of articles reveal several recurrent insights, such as the dysfunctionalities of targeting systems in most of the Global South; the fragmentation and incoherence that is typical of social protection and related policies and programmes; the tensions involved in donor promotion, oversight, and monitoring of social protection programmes; related to this, the contestations between popular universalistic aspirations versus the narrow residualism of programmes promoted by donors; and the fundamentally political ways that “pro-poor” policy is envisaged.

Politics and GovernanceVol. 14
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Human Rights and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.