Upfront aspirin-free antiplatelet monotherapy after percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and efficacy
BACKGROUND: Evidence comparing non-aspirin single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) with aspirin-containing dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is limited. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of non-aspirin SAPT with a P2Y12 inhibitor started at or within one week of PCI. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for studies evaluating non-aspirin SAPT after PCI. Primary outcomes were bleeding defined by Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria [BARC 1-5 (any bleeding) and BARC 3-5 (major bleeding)], all-cause mortality (ACM), and cardiovascular mortality. Secondary outcomes were stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), need for revascularization, and stent thrombosis (STS). RESULTS: =0%). CONCLUSION: Upfront aspirin-free SAPT after PCI was associated with increased risks of MI and revascularization without a reduction in bleeding compared with aspirin-based DAPT.
Authors
- Nitin Mahajan
- Kunal Mahajan
- Shekhar Vohra
- Akshyaya Pradhan
- Deep Dutta
Institutions
- Mount Sinai Health System (US)
- Yahoo (Spain) (ES)
- King George's Medical University (IN)
- Mount Sinai Hospital (US)
- Center for Rheumatology (US)
- Mymensingh Medical College Hospital (BD)
- Indian Institute of Technology Mandi (IN)
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Indian Heart Journal
- Published
- 2026-04-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2026.04.002
- Primary Topic
- Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00