“The Difference” of Objects “Is Spreading”: A Non‐Anthropocentric Reading of <i>Tender Buttons</i>

ABSTRACT This article discusses the nonreferentiality of both language and the object in Gertrude Stein's Tender Buttons through an analysis of “Book.,” a section of the chapter “Objects.” While the inaccessibility of Tender Buttons is well known due to Stein's linguistic experimentalism, the objects presented as section titles also challenge conventional perceptions of the “object” by encompassing non‐material and living entities. These title‐objects remain largely obscure, as they are partially described but simultaneously left largely undescribed throughout the text. At the same time, other objects continue to appear with a similar kind of inaccessibility, and consequently the text remains elusive despite the scholarly attention it has received since its publication in 1914. Tender Buttons thus suggests that language cannot be entirely controlled, nor can objects be fully possessed from an anthropocentric perspective. In this regard, a recognition of strangeness when encountering objects in the text may be viewed as a step toward perceiving a lesser‐known aspect of reality in which, to modify Stein's manifesto, “[t]he difference” of objects “is spreading.”

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Literature Compass
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/lic3.70052
Primary Topic
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“The Difference” of Objects “Is Spreading”: A Non‐Anthropocentric Reading of Tender Buttons

Joon Ho Hwang
Literature Compass
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
article

“The Difference” of Objects “Is Spreading”: A Non‐Anthropocentric Reading of Tender Buttons

Joon Ho Hwang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article discusses the nonreferentiality of both language and the object in Gertrude Stein's Tender Buttons through an analysis of “Book.,” a section of the chapter “Objects.” While the inaccessibility of Tender Buttons is well known due to Stein's linguistic experimentalism, the objects presented as section titles also challenge conventional perceptions of the “object” by encompassing non‐material and living entities. These title‐objects remain largely obscure, as they are partially described but simultaneously left largely undescribed throughout the text. At the same time, other objects continue to appear with a similar kind of inaccessibility, and consequently the text remains elusive despite the scholarly attention it has received since its publication in 1914. Tender Buttons thus suggests that language cannot be entirely controlled, nor can objects be fully possessed from an anthropocentric perspective. In this regard, a recognition of strangeness when encountering objects in the text may be viewed as a step toward perceiving a lesser‐known aspect of reality in which, to modify Stein's manifesto, “[t]he difference” of objects “is spreading.”

Literature CompassVol. 23(2)
Ewha Womans University (KR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.