Male scent-marks predict fitness via socio-spatial dominance, but not female choice, in a lacertid lizard

Abstract Chemical communication via scent-marks is widely recognized as a key mediator of sexual selection in lizards, yet it remains poorly understood how scent-mark composition ultimately impacts male fitness in nature. Male scent-marks are often proposed to function as condition-dependent honest sexual signals mediating female choice, but an alternative hypothesis is that they primarily function and have evolved in the context of male–male competition. We provide a comprehensive test of these competing hypotheses. We studied common wall lizards (Podarcis muralis) in outdoor enclosures and combined chemical analyses of scent-marks with detailed behavioural and spatial data, genetic parentage assignment and path analysis to quantify how scent-mark composition relates to mating behaviour, contest outcomes, sperm competition and male reproductive success. We found no evidence that females assess mates based on candidate compounds proposed as signals of male quality. Instead, female settlement and fertilization patterns were driven by resource distribution and spatial proximity. Furthermore, several compounds correlated with dominance, and male–male competition emerged as the primary driver of reproductive success, strongly suggesting that scent-marks mediate territorial dynamics, rather than female choice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2026.0863
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Male scent-marks predict fitness via socio-spatial dominance, but not female choice, in a lacertid lizard

Tobias Uller, Javier Ábalos, Roberto García‐Roa, Pau Carazo et al.
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Animal Behavior and Reproduction
article

Male scent-marks predict fitness via socio-spatial dominance, but not female choice, in a lacertid lizard

Tobias Uller, Javier Ábalos, Roberto García‐Roa, Pau Carazo, Guillem Pérez i de Lanuza, Fabien Aubret, Alicia Bartolomé, Enrique Font
article en

Abstract

Abstract Chemical communication via scent-marks is widely recognized as a key mediator of sexual selection in lizards, yet it remains poorly understood how scent-mark composition ultimately impacts male fitness in nature. Male scent-marks are often proposed to function as condition-dependent honest sexual signals mediating female choice, but an alternative hypothesis is that they primarily function and have evolved in the context of male–male competition. We provide a comprehensive test of these competing hypotheses. We studied common wall lizards (Podarcis muralis) in outdoor enclosures and combined chemical analyses of scent-marks with detailed behavioural and spatial data, genetic parentage assignment and path analysis to quantify how scent-mark composition relates to mating behaviour, contest outcomes, sperm competition and male reproductive success. We found no evidence that females assess mates based on candidate compounds proposed as signals of male quality. Instead, female settlement and fertilization patterns were driven by resource distribution and spatial proximity. Furthermore, several compounds correlated with dominance, and male–male competition emerged as the primary driver of reproductive success, strongly suggesting that scent-marks mediate territorial dynamics, rather than female choice.

Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesVol. 293(2082)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Tasmania (AU), Lund University (SE), Station d’Écologie Théorique et Expérimentale (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Animal Behavior and Reproduction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon