Coherence and Imaginarity as Resources in Quantum Circuit Complexity

ABSTRACT Quantum circuit complexity quantifies the minimal number of gates needed to realize a unitary transformation and plays a central role in quantum computation. In this work, we investigate the complexity of quantum circuits through coherence and imaginarity resources. We establish a lower bound on the circuit cost by the Tsallis relative entropy of cohering power, which is shown to be tighter than the one presented by Bu et al. [ Communications in Mathematical Physics 405, no. 7 (2024): 161] under restrictive conditions. As a consequence, we obtain the relationships between the circuit cost and the coherence generating power via probabilistic average in terms of skew information/relative entropy, and present explicit bounds of the circuit cost for typical quantum gates. Moreover, we derive lower bounds on the circuit cost via the imaginaring power of the circuit, induced by the Tsallis relative entropy and relative entropy. We demonstrate that imaginarity can yield nontrivial constraints on the circuit cost even when coherence‐based lower bounds are zero (e.g., for the gate), which implies that imaginarity may provide advantages under certain circumstances compared with coherence. Our results may help better understand the connections between quantum resources and circuit complexity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Quantum Technologies
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/qute.202501007
Primary Topic
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coherence and Imaginarity as Resources in Quantum Circuit Complexity

Zhaoqi Wu, Nanrun Zhou, Linlin Ye
Advanced Quantum Technologies
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
article

Coherence and Imaginarity as Resources in Quantum Circuit Complexity

Zhaoqi Wu, Nanrun Zhou, Linlin Ye
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Quantum circuit complexity quantifies the minimal number of gates needed to realize a unitary transformation and plays a central role in quantum computation. In this work, we investigate the complexity of quantum circuits through coherence and imaginarity resources. We establish a lower bound on the circuit cost by the Tsallis relative entropy of cohering power, which is shown to be tighter than the one presented by Bu et al. [ Communications in Mathematical Physics 405, no. 7 (2024): 161] under restrictive conditions. As a consequence, we obtain the relationships between the circuit cost and the coherence generating power via probabilistic average in terms of skew information/relative entropy, and present explicit bounds of the circuit cost for typical quantum gates. Moreover, we derive lower bounds on the circuit cost via the imaginaring power of the circuit, induced by the Tsallis relative entropy and relative entropy. We demonstrate that imaginarity can yield nontrivial constraints on the circuit cost even when coherence‐based lower bounds are zero (e.g., for the gate), which implies that imaginarity may provide advantages under certain circumstances compared with coherence. Our results may help better understand the connections between quantum resources and circuit complexity.

Advanced Quantum TechnologiesVol. 9(4)
Nanchang University (CN), Shanghai University of Engineering Science (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.