Interventions for improving home food environments and household food security in adult populations residing in low-income settings: a systematic review protocol

INTRODUCTION: Overweight and obesity are a growing global public health problem. Eating behaviours of adults and children are largely influenced by the home food environment (HFE). The lack of access to nutritious food in homes contributes to unhealthy dietary habits and, consequently, overweight and obesity among adults and children, as well as chronic diseases associated with poor diets. The present systematic review aims to identify existing HFE and household food security interventions and to determine the effects of these interventions in improving the availability of healthy food in the home, household access to food, diet quality and nutritional status of adults. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This systematic review protocol was developed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis protocols guidelines. Electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct and CINAHL (EBSCOhost) will be searched for relevant articles using keywords and MeSH terms. Risk of bias will be assessed using the adapted Cochrane effective practice and organisation of Care risk of bias tool for studies with a separate control group and Risk of Bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. The overall strength of the evidence for each outcome will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation tool. Two reviewers will independently screen the identified records and assess the eligible full texts for inclusion. Any discrepancies will be resolved through consensus or consultation with a third reviewer. Where sufficient homogeneous data are available, subgroup analysis will be conducted to explore heterogeneity. A thematic synthesis will be performed for qualitative studies. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has a systematic review and meta-analysis design, which will assess published data and does not require ethical approval. Findings of the systematic review will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD420251030896.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Open
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111713
Primary Topic
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interventions for improving home food environments and household food security in adult populations residing in low-income settings: a systematic review protocol

Sihle E. Mabhida, Jillian Hill, Samukelisiwe S. Madlala
BMJ Open
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
article

Interventions for improving home food environments and household food security in adult populations residing in low-income settings: a systematic review protocol

Sihle E. Mabhida, Jillian Hill, Samukelisiwe S. Madlala
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Overweight and obesity are a growing global public health problem. Eating behaviours of adults and children are largely influenced by the home food environment (HFE). The lack of access to nutritious food in homes contributes to unhealthy dietary habits and, consequently, overweight and obesity among adults and children, as well as chronic diseases associated with poor diets. The present systematic review aims to identify existing HFE and household food security interventions and to determine the effects of these interventions in improving the availability of healthy food in the home, household access to food, diet quality and nutritional status of adults. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This systematic review protocol was developed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis protocols guidelines. Electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct and CINAHL (EBSCOhost) will be searched for relevant articles using keywords and MeSH terms. Risk of bias will be assessed using the adapted Cochrane effective practice and organisation of Care risk of bias tool for studies with a separate control group and Risk of Bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. The overall strength of the evidence for each outcome will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation tool. Two reviewers will independently screen the identified records and assess the eligible full texts for inclusion. Any discrepancies will be resolved through consensus or consultation with a third reviewer. Where sufficient homogeneous data are available, subgroup analysis will be conducted to explore heterogeneity. A thematic synthesis will be performed for qualitative studies. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has a systematic review and meta-analysis design, which will assess published data and does not require ethical approval. Findings of the systematic review will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD420251030896.

BMJ OpenVol. 16(4)
South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
National Research Foundation
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.