Differences in Endoscopy Characteristics Between Providers With the Highest and Lowest Post Endoscopy Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Rates in England

BACKGROUND: Post-endoscopy upper gastrointestinal cancer (PEUGIC) rates vary over threefold between endoscopy providers in England. To determine if variations in endoscopy characteristics contribute, providers with the lowest and highest PEUGIC rates were compared. METHODS: Endoscopy providers were categorized into quartiles based on PEUGIC rates and those in the highest and lowest quartiles studied. Data for diagnostic upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy performed between January 2019 and February 2020 were extracted from the National Endoscopy Database. Multivariable regression analysis explored the endoscopy characteristics associated with the lowest PEUGIC rate providers after adjusting for patient characteristics and indications. RESULTS: In total, 328,354 diagnostic UGI endoscopy performed by 54 providers were included. Endoscopy characteristics positively associated with the lowest PEUGIC rate providers included: training sessions (Odds Ratio 1.85 (95% CI 1.81-1.90)); intravenous sedation use (1.09 (1.07-1.11)); endoscopist average UGI endoscopy annual volume 101-200 (1.05 (1.02-1.07) and 201-300 (1.16 (1.13-1.19)). Endoscopy characteristics inversely associated with the lowest PEUGIC rate providers included: endoscopy half-day sessions with average ≥ 9 points (0.72 (0.71-0.74)); endoscopists not on nursing, specialty or trainee register (0.83 (0.81-0.85)); and biopsies during endoscopy (0.84 (0.83-0.86)). Compliance with national quality standards to biopsy high risk conditions was better in providers with the lowest PEUGIC rates. DISCUSSION: Training sessions, more endoscopists with minimum annual endoscopy volumes > 100, more intravenous sedation, less biopsies and lower intensity endoscopy sessions were associated with the lowest PEUGIC rate providers. These findings may help guide efforts to reduce PEUGIC and improve endoscopy quality in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
United European Gastroenterology Journal
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.70206
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
26.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in Endoscopy Characteristics Between Providers With the Highest and Lowest Post Endoscopy Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Rates in England

Umair Kamran, N Trudgill, David Beaton, Nicola J. Adderley et al.
1 citations
United European Gastroenterology Journal
Surgical Simulation and Training
26.11
article

Differences in Endoscopy Characteristics Between Providers With the Highest and Lowest Post Endoscopy Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Rates in England

Umair Kamran, N Trudgill, David Beaton, Nicola J. Adderley, Mimi McCord, Matthew Brookes, Felicity Evison, Matt Rutter, Eva J.A. Morris
article en
1 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Post-endoscopy upper gastrointestinal cancer (PEUGIC) rates vary over threefold between endoscopy providers in England. To determine if variations in endoscopy characteristics contribute, providers with the lowest and highest PEUGIC rates were compared. METHODS: Endoscopy providers were categorized into quartiles based on PEUGIC rates and those in the highest and lowest quartiles studied. Data for diagnostic upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy performed between January 2019 and February 2020 were extracted from the National Endoscopy Database. Multivariable regression analysis explored the endoscopy characteristics associated with the lowest PEUGIC rate providers after adjusting for patient characteristics and indications. RESULTS: In total, 328,354 diagnostic UGI endoscopy performed by 54 providers were included. Endoscopy characteristics positively associated with the lowest PEUGIC rate providers included: training sessions (Odds Ratio 1.85 (95% CI 1.81-1.90)); intravenous sedation use (1.09 (1.07-1.11)); endoscopist average UGI endoscopy annual volume 101-200 (1.05 (1.02-1.07) and 201-300 (1.16 (1.13-1.19)). Endoscopy characteristics inversely associated with the lowest PEUGIC rate providers included: endoscopy half-day sessions with average ≥ 9 points (0.72 (0.71-0.74)); endoscopists not on nursing, specialty or trainee register (0.83 (0.81-0.85)); and biopsies during endoscopy (0.84 (0.83-0.86)). Compliance with national quality standards to biopsy high risk conditions was better in providers with the lowest PEUGIC rates. DISCUSSION: Training sessions, more endoscopists with minimum annual endoscopy volumes > 100, more intravenous sedation, less biopsies and lower intensity endoscopy sessions were associated with the lowest PEUGIC rate providers. These findings may help guide efforts to reduce PEUGIC and improve endoscopy quality in the future.

United European Gastroenterology JournalVol. 14(3)
University of Wolverhampton (GB), North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Heartland Cancer Research (US), Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (GB), The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust (GB), NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre (GB), University of Birmingham (GB), Newcastle University (GB)
British Society for Geomorphology, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Research for Patient Benefit Programme
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Surgical Simulation and Training
26.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.