Differences in Endoscopy Characteristics Between Providers With the Highest and Lowest Post Endoscopy Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Rates in England
BACKGROUND: Post-endoscopy upper gastrointestinal cancer (PEUGIC) rates vary over threefold between endoscopy providers in England. To determine if variations in endoscopy characteristics contribute, providers with the lowest and highest PEUGIC rates were compared. METHODS: Endoscopy providers were categorized into quartiles based on PEUGIC rates and those in the highest and lowest quartiles studied. Data for diagnostic upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy performed between January 2019 and February 2020 were extracted from the National Endoscopy Database. Multivariable regression analysis explored the endoscopy characteristics associated with the lowest PEUGIC rate providers after adjusting for patient characteristics and indications. RESULTS: In total, 328,354 diagnostic UGI endoscopy performed by 54 providers were included. Endoscopy characteristics positively associated with the lowest PEUGIC rate providers included: training sessions (Odds Ratio 1.85 (95% CI 1.81-1.90)); intravenous sedation use (1.09 (1.07-1.11)); endoscopist average UGI endoscopy annual volume 101-200 (1.05 (1.02-1.07) and 201-300 (1.16 (1.13-1.19)). Endoscopy characteristics inversely associated with the lowest PEUGIC rate providers included: endoscopy half-day sessions with average ≥ 9 points (0.72 (0.71-0.74)); endoscopists not on nursing, specialty or trainee register (0.83 (0.81-0.85)); and biopsies during endoscopy (0.84 (0.83-0.86)). Compliance with national quality standards to biopsy high risk conditions was better in providers with the lowest PEUGIC rates. DISCUSSION: Training sessions, more endoscopists with minimum annual endoscopy volumes > 100, more intravenous sedation, less biopsies and lower intensity endoscopy sessions were associated with the lowest PEUGIC rate providers. These findings may help guide efforts to reduce PEUGIC and improve endoscopy quality in the future.
Authors
- Umair Kamran (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6531-9205)
- N Trudgill
- David Beaton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4329-8842)
- Nicola J. Adderley (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0543-3254)
- Mimi McCord
- Matthew Brookes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8782-0292)
- Felicity Evison (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9378-7548)
- Matt Rutter
- Eva J.A. Morris
Institutions
- University of Wolverhampton (GB)
- North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
- Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Heartland Cancer Research (US)
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (GB)
- The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust (GB)
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre (GB)
- University of Birmingham (GB)
- Newcastle University (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- United European Gastroenterology Journal
- Published
- 2026-04-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.70206
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Surgical Simulation and Training
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 26.11
Funders
- British Society for Geomorphology
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- Research for Patient Benefit Programme