Robots for ecological monitoring: a review

Abstract Technologies for biodiversity assessment are crucial for addressing the global biodiversity crisis, and ecological monitoring is seeing increased use of robotics. Interdisciplinary working will be critical in finding the best robotic solutions for monitoring. As a team of ecologists and robotics scientists, we conducted a systematic literature search for robots in ecological monitoring and reviewed their ecological monitoring applications and technological capabilities, such as level of autonomy, operation time and adaptability. We identified 67 relevant papers reporting individual robots or robot teams. The number of robots developed for ecological monitoring has grown rapidly in recent years, targeting a wide range of taxa or communities. Image or video capture were the most common types of monitoring although telemetry, acoustics, echolocation, radar and fluorescence sensors have been adopted. We identified that further use of acoustic monitoring and eDNA collection could provide enhanced robotic monitoring opportunities. Technological capabilities are more advanced for robots built for marine environments or lacustrine freshwater ecosystems than for terrestrial or lotic freshwater ecosystems. This likely reflects the longer history of marine robot development, lack of alternative surveying approaches at depth or far from infrastructure, and the energy rich environment and neutral buoyancy that oceans provide. Nevertheless, there are opportunities for robots to enhance terrestrial ecological monitoring, particularly where teams of robots can be developed. Recent developments in autonomous navigation systems, visual sensors and energy management offer potential solutions that could be integrated into robots for ecology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biodiversity and Conservation
Published
2026-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-026-03339-3
Primary Topic
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robots for ecological monitoring: a review

Karen Diele, Antoine Cully, Léni Le Goff, Patrick J.C. White et al.
Biodiversity and Conservation
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
article

Robots for ecological monitoring: a review

Karen Diele, Antoine Cully, Léni Le Goff, Patrick J.C. White, Matthew Wale, Emma Hart
article en

Abstract

Abstract Technologies for biodiversity assessment are crucial for addressing the global biodiversity crisis, and ecological monitoring is seeing increased use of robotics. Interdisciplinary working will be critical in finding the best robotic solutions for monitoring. As a team of ecologists and robotics scientists, we conducted a systematic literature search for robots in ecological monitoring and reviewed their ecological monitoring applications and technological capabilities, such as level of autonomy, operation time and adaptability. We identified 67 relevant papers reporting individual robots or robot teams. The number of robots developed for ecological monitoring has grown rapidly in recent years, targeting a wide range of taxa or communities. Image or video capture were the most common types of monitoring although telemetry, acoustics, echolocation, radar and fluorescence sensors have been adopted. We identified that further use of acoustic monitoring and eDNA collection could provide enhanced robotic monitoring opportunities. Technological capabilities are more advanced for robots built for marine environments or lacustrine freshwater ecosystems than for terrestrial or lotic freshwater ecosystems. This likely reflects the longer history of marine robot development, lack of alternative surveying approaches at depth or far from infrastructure, and the energy rich environment and neutral buoyancy that oceans provide. Nevertheless, there are opportunities for robots to enhance terrestrial ecological monitoring, particularly where teams of robots can be developed. Recent developments in autonomous navigation systems, visual sensors and energy management offer potential solutions that could be integrated into robots for ecology.

Biodiversity and ConservationVol. 35(6)
Edinburgh Napier University (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Edinburgh Napier University
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.