When We Think “News Will Find Me”: Relative Credibility of Social-Media Friends, Algorithms, and Editors

Many individuals do not seek news, believing instead that “news will find me” (NFM), implying that they trust their social networks to keep them informed, saving them the trouble of proactively seeking news from journalistic outlets. Does this mean that they trust social media algorithms to accurately filter and recommend content that is relevant to them? Do they trust their friends to keep them informed, just like they would journalists? To answer these questions, we conducted a pre-registered between-subjects experiment ( N = 244) in which users with varying levels of NFM were randomly assigned to receive news recommended by either their social media friends, news editors, or an algorithm. We discovered that while users tend to act on news recommended by an algorithm mindlessly before reading it first, the type of cognitive heuristic triggered by a news source plays an important role in shaping their trust. Specifically, individuals high on NFM tend to trust algorithms because they trigger the “machine heuristic.” They also consider social media friends and algorithms to be as authoritative as news journalists and editors (“authority heuristic”). Our results advance theoretical knowledge about why high levels of NFM predict higher trust in social media friends and algorithms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Media + Society
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051261434801
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When We Think “News Will Find Me”: Relative Credibility of Social-Media Friends, Algorithms, and Editors

Timilehin Durotoye, Mengqi Liao, S. Shyam Sundar, Homero Gil de Zúñiga
Social Media + Society
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

When We Think “News Will Find Me”: Relative Credibility of Social-Media Friends, Algorithms, and Editors

Timilehin Durotoye, Mengqi Liao, S. Shyam Sundar, Homero Gil de Zúñiga
article en

Abstract

Many individuals do not seek news, believing instead that “news will find me” (NFM), implying that they trust their social networks to keep them informed, saving them the trouble of proactively seeking news from journalistic outlets. Does this mean that they trust social media algorithms to accurately filter and recommend content that is relevant to them? Do they trust their friends to keep them informed, just like they would journalists? To answer these questions, we conducted a pre-registered between-subjects experiment ( N = 244) in which users with varying levels of NFM were randomly assigned to receive news recommended by either their social media friends, news editors, or an algorithm. We discovered that while users tend to act on news recommended by an algorithm mindlessly before reading it first, the type of cognitive heuristic triggered by a news source plays an important role in shaping their trust. Specifically, individuals high on NFM tend to trust algorithms because they trigger the “machine heuristic.” They also consider social media friends and algorithms to be as authoritative as news journalists and editors (“authority heuristic”). Our results advance theoretical knowledge about why high levels of NFM predict higher trust in social media friends and algorithms.

Social Media + SocietyVol. 12(2)
Pennsylvania State University (US), University of Georgia (US), Universidad de Salamanca (ES), University of Florida (US), Sungkyunkwan University (KR), Universidad Diego Portales (CL)
Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.