Telemedicine Kiosks: Can Technology Solve Rural Mississippi's Healthcare Crisis?
Background: Mississippi’s rural counties face hospital gaps, clinician shortages, and limited broadband/device access that collectively delay care and constrain telehealth uptake. Purpose: This paper assesses whether telemedicine kiosks can improve rural healthcare access in Mississippi while also supporting viable local entrepreneurship and community development. Methods: A conceptual, policy-and-market analysis integrated narrative literature synthesis, secondary data and policy review, and 5-year financial modeling under two cost-allocation scenarios: an Operator Model (subscription fees covered by partners/grants) and a Network Model (subscription fees borne by the kiosk operator). Results: Kiosks with embedded connectivity and diagnostic peripherals can deliver device-independent virtual care and directly address provider scarcity and the digital divide. Financial modeling indicates basic kiosks can be financially viable under the Operator Model, with payback periods generally under 2 years, while advanced systems can be viable on longer horizons (approximately 4 to 5 years) with adequate utilization. In contrast, modeled Network Model scenarios were not financially viable at typical utilization levels unless subscription costs are subsidized or utilization and reimbursement increase substantially. Conclusions: Telemedicine kiosks can function as strategic rural health infrastructure in Mississippi when deployed through community–health system partnerships, careful site selection, and shared-cost or grant-supported operating structures that reduce ongoing subscription burdens.
Authors
- Babu George (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2791-828X)
- Martha Ravola
Institutions
- Alcorn State University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Public Health in the Deep South
- Published
- 2026-03-31
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.55533/2996-6833.1120
- Primary Topic
- Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00