Vertical and horizontal equity in support for children with disabilities: A cross-sectional analysis of Australia's national disability insurance scheme

Children with disabilities face persistent disadvantages in health, participation, and development. In Australia, the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) is a central funding mechanism for disability support. Equity is an explicit principle of the NDIS, yet concerns remain about whether access and experiences are equitable. This study examines equity in three outcomes of NDIS support for children with disabilities: (1) whether the child has a NDIS plan, (2) the level of plan funding, and (3) parental satisfaction with NDIS supports. We assess these outcomes through the lens of vertical and horizontal equity. Data come from the 2024 Better Support for Kids with Disabilities survey (N=688 parents of children aged 2–17 years with disabilities). Logistic regression was used to model NDIS participation, ordinal logistic regression to model plan value, and linear regression to model satisfaction. Children with greater functional limitations were more likely to have a NDIS plan and to receive higher funding, indicating partial vertical equity. However, parents of children with greater functional limitations reported lower satisfaction. Horizontal equity was largely supported for the NDIS plan and funding outcomes, with few systematic disparities after accounting for functional limitations. Parents of older children, with fewer financial resources, and families including adults with disabilities reported lower satisfaction. The NDIS appropriately directs greater resources toward children with higher needs, but inequities persist in satisfaction and experiences of support. Addressing disparities in navigation and service quality is essential to achieving equitable outcomes for all children with disabilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Disability and health journal
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2026.102073
Primary Topic
Healthcare innovation and challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vertical and horizontal equity in support for children with disabilities: A cross-sectional analysis of Australia's national disability insurance scheme

Jessica Hill, Prof Martin O'Flaherty, Jennifer Smith-Merry
Disability and health journal
Healthcare innovation and challenges
article

Vertical and horizontal equity in support for children with disabilities: A cross-sectional analysis of Australia's national disability insurance scheme

Jessica Hill, Prof Martin O'Flaherty, Jennifer Smith-Merry
article en

Abstract

Children with disabilities face persistent disadvantages in health, participation, and development. In Australia, the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) is a central funding mechanism for disability support. Equity is an explicit principle of the NDIS, yet concerns remain about whether access and experiences are equitable. This study examines equity in three outcomes of NDIS support for children with disabilities: (1) whether the child has a NDIS plan, (2) the level of plan funding, and (3) parental satisfaction with NDIS supports. We assess these outcomes through the lens of vertical and horizontal equity. Data come from the 2024 Better Support for Kids with Disabilities survey (N=688 parents of children aged 2–17 years with disabilities). Logistic regression was used to model NDIS participation, ordinal logistic regression to model plan value, and linear regression to model satisfaction. Children with greater functional limitations were more likely to have a NDIS plan and to receive higher funding, indicating partial vertical equity. However, parents of children with greater functional limitations reported lower satisfaction. Horizontal equity was largely supported for the NDIS plan and funding outcomes, with few systematic disparities after accounting for functional limitations. Parents of older children, with fewer financial resources, and families including adults with disabilities reported lower satisfaction. The NDIS appropriately directs greater resources toward children with higher needs, but inequities persist in satisfaction and experiences of support. Addressing disparities in navigation and service quality is essential to achieving equitable outcomes for all children with disabilities.

Disability and health journal
The University of Sydney (AU), The University of Queensland (AU)
Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Healthcare innovation and challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.