Client and Health Care Provider Perspectives on Point-of-Care Testing for Sexually Transmitted Infections in Community Pharmacies in Uganda

Introduction: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends testing for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), but laboratory-based and rapid or point-of-care (POC) testing are often unavailable and unaffordable, especially in low-resource settings, leading to empiric (usually antibiotic) treatment. Community pharmacies (CPs) are often the first point of contact for persons with symptoms of STIs, where pharmacists dispense treatment without diagnostic testing or prescriptions. This study evaluated clients, providers, and policymakers' perspectives on POC testing for STIs in CPs for targeted treatment. Methods: We nested a qualitative study into a study of participants seeking both STI and non-STI treatments in CPs. They were tested for HIV, syphilis, trichomonas, chlamydia, and gonorrhea using both rapid POC tests and a central reference lab. A purposive sample of 50 participants from September 2020 to June 2022 consented to participate in in-depth and key informant interviews. Data were analyzed thematically using an inductive approach. Results: Clients (n=35), health care providers (n=9), and policy makers (n=6) highlighted the benefits of POC tests for HIV and STIs at CPs, including affordability, accessibility, and ensuring convenience. The impact of POC testing for STI diagnosis and treatment was promoting behavioral change, rapid results turnaround time, leading to faster treatment access compared to conventional laboratory methods, and supporting sustainable antimicrobial resistance (AMR) control. Barriers to POC testing included a lack of awareness among clients and health workers, inadequate privacy and space, long wait times, unclear self-sample collection instructions, stigma around HIV testing, and reluctance to test for STIs beyond HIV. To address these, participant recommendations included raising STI awareness, providing more explanation of test results, increasing test access, addressing stigma, provider training, and ensuring a sustainable supply chain for testing kits. Conclusions: POC testing for STIs and HIV in CP settings was found to be highly acceptable to both pharmacy clients and providers. Integrating POC testing in CPs could be beneficial for national STI management programs. If the existing barriers are addressed, POC tests could improve accessibility to STI diagnostics and facilitate better linkage to care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
medRxiv
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.02.26350027
Primary Topic
Reproductive tract infections research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Client and Health Care Provider Perspectives on Point-of-Care Testing for Sexually Transmitted Infections in Community Pharmacies in Uganda

Johan H. Melendez, Adelline Twimukye, Peter Kyambadde, Matthew M. Hamill et al.
medRxiv
Reproductive tract infections research
article

Client and Health Care Provider Perspectives on Point-of-Care Testing for Sexually Transmitted Infections in Community Pharmacies in Uganda

Johan H. Melendez, Adelline Twimukye, Peter Kyambadde, Matthew M. Hamill, Annet Onzia, Rosalind Parkes-Ratanshi, Yukari C. Manabe, Agnes Kiragga
article en

Abstract

Introduction: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends testing for sexually transmitted infections (STIs), but laboratory-based and rapid or point-of-care (POC) testing are often unavailable and unaffordable, especially in low-resource settings, leading to empiric (usually antibiotic) treatment. Community pharmacies (CPs) are often the first point of contact for persons with symptoms of STIs, where pharmacists dispense treatment without diagnostic testing or prescriptions. This study evaluated clients, providers, and policymakers' perspectives on POC testing for STIs in CPs for targeted treatment. Methods: We nested a qualitative study into a study of participants seeking both STI and non-STI treatments in CPs. They were tested for HIV, syphilis, trichomonas, chlamydia, and gonorrhea using both rapid POC tests and a central reference lab. A purposive sample of 50 participants from September 2020 to June 2022 consented to participate in in-depth and key informant interviews. Data were analyzed thematically using an inductive approach. Results: Clients (n=35), health care providers (n=9), and policy makers (n=6) highlighted the benefits of POC tests for HIV and STIs at CPs, including affordability, accessibility, and ensuring convenience. The impact of POC testing for STI diagnosis and treatment was promoting behavioral change, rapid results turnaround time, leading to faster treatment access compared to conventional laboratory methods, and supporting sustainable antimicrobial resistance (AMR) control. Barriers to POC testing included a lack of awareness among clients and health workers, inadequate privacy and space, long wait times, unclear self-sample collection instructions, stigma around HIV testing, and reluctance to test for STIs beyond HIV. To address these, participant recommendations included raising STI awareness, providing more explanation of test results, increasing test access, addressing stigma, provider training, and ensuring a sustainable supply chain for testing kits. Conclusions: POC testing for STIs and HIV in CP settings was found to be highly acceptable to both pharmacy clients and providers. Integrating POC testing in CPs could be beneficial for national STI management programs. If the existing barriers are addressed, POC tests could improve accessibility to STI diagnostics and facilitate better linkage to care.

medRxiv
Queen's University Belfast (GB), Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Ministry of Health (UG), Infectious Diseases Institute (UG), African Population and Health Research Center (KE), Makerere University (UG)
Johns Hopkins University, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Reproductive tract infections research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.