On Limitations of Several Approaches for Correcting Coarse Flow Simulations With Machine Learning Techniques

ABSTRACT This paper explores several methods intended to predict corrections to improve coarse grid solutions of a flow field. Motivated by applications in hemodynamics, this flow is on the transition to turbulence, and simulations are performed on unstructured tetrahedral grids. The predictions are based on learning deep neural networks with differences of coarse and fine grid solutions. Two kinds of feedforward networks, several graph neural networks, and a hierarchical neural network are studied. To simplify the task, the correction of the statistically steady state is considered. However, even then, all studied approaches fail to produce useful results in the validation step, which reveals limitations of current deep learning approaches to predict coarse grid corrections for complicated flow problems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ZAMM ‐ Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics / Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.70373
Primary Topic
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On Limitations of Several Approaches for Correcting Coarse Flow Simulations With Machine Learning Techniques

Volker John
ZAMM ‐ Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics / Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
article

On Limitations of Several Approaches for Correcting Coarse Flow Simulations With Machine Learning Techniques

Volker John
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper explores several methods intended to predict corrections to improve coarse grid solutions of a flow field. Motivated by applications in hemodynamics, this flow is on the transition to turbulence, and simulations are performed on unstructured tetrahedral grids. The predictions are based on learning deep neural networks with differences of coarse and fine grid solutions. Two kinds of feedforward networks, several graph neural networks, and a hierarchical neural network are studied. To simplify the task, the correction of the statistically steady state is considered. However, even then, all studied approaches fail to produce useful results in the validation step, which reveals limitations of current deep learning approaches to predict coarse grid corrections for complicated flow problems.

ZAMM ‐ Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics / Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und MechanikVol. 106(4)
Weierstrass Institute for Applied Analysis and Stochastics (DE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.