The balancing act: User responsibility and platform accountability in the context of mental illness-related content consumption

Although social media platforms provide affirming information and interactions, they might also serve as venues to (re)traumatize individuals through exposure to sensitive content, especially related to mental illness (e.g. suicide, self-harm). Applying the trauma-informed design framework, we employ a two-pronged methodological approach to evaluate (1) what potentially sensitive or traumatizing content relate to mental illness individuals report consuming on social media (i.e. seeking content out voluntarily or via algorithmic exposure); (2) perceptions of the role of the user and social media platforms, respectively, in integrating trauma-informed approaches; and (3) suggestions for how social media moderation policies could be (more) trauma-informed. We identified a spectrum among participants of perceived responsibility of individuals using social media and social media platforms for moderating sensitive and/or traumatic mental illness-related content.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Media & Society
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448261435958
Primary Topic
Mental Health via Writing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The balancing act: User responsibility and platform accountability in the context of mental illness-related content consumption

Nazanin Andalibi, Anne Oeldorf-Hirsch, Lili R. Romann
New Media & Society
Mental Health via Writing
article

The balancing act: User responsibility and platform accountability in the context of mental illness-related content consumption

Nazanin Andalibi, Anne Oeldorf-Hirsch, Lili R. Romann
article en

Abstract

Although social media platforms provide affirming information and interactions, they might also serve as venues to (re)traumatize individuals through exposure to sensitive content, especially related to mental illness (e.g. suicide, self-harm). Applying the trauma-informed design framework, we employ a two-pronged methodological approach to evaluate (1) what potentially sensitive or traumatizing content relate to mental illness individuals report consuming on social media (i.e. seeking content out voluntarily or via algorithmic exposure); (2) perceptions of the role of the user and social media platforms, respectively, in integrating trauma-informed approaches; and (3) suggestions for how social media moderation policies could be (more) trauma-informed. We identified a spectrum among participants of perceived responsibility of individuals using social media and social media platforms for moderating sensitive and/or traumatic mental illness-related content.

New Media & Society
University of Connecticut (US), University of Michigan (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Mental Health via Writing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The balancing act: User responsibility and platform accountability in the context of mental illness-related content consumption — Nazanin Andalibi, Anne Oeldorf-Hirsch, et al. · New Media & Society (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS