Household Behavior under Macroprudential Borrower-Based Measures

This paper develops a life cycle model to study household choice under macroprudential borrower-based measures (BBMs). The model is extended to multiple heterogeneous households, allowing to assess both aggregate and distributional effects of BBMs on mortgage and housing demand. The framework is applied to Lithuanian and Slovak distributional data to quantify the impact of various BBM configurations. We find that the presence of binding BBMs can usefully dampen mortgage and house price growth. However, tight regulation may also redirect demand towards lower-valued housing, while pushing households into the rental market. In particular, loan-to-value (LTV) limits are most constraining for households with little or no initial wealth. This highlights the distributional consequences of BBMs and the importance of designing regulation to account for borrower characteristics.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
IMF Working Paper
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5089/9798229042437.001
Primary Topic
Housing Market and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Household Behavior under Macroprudential Borrower-Based Measures

Jaunius Karmelavičius, Julia Otten
IMF Working Paper
Housing Market and Economics
article

Household Behavior under Macroprudential Borrower-Based Measures

Jaunius Karmelavičius, Julia Otten
article en

Abstract

This paper develops a life cycle model to study household choice under macroprudential borrower-based measures (BBMs). The model is extended to multiple heterogeneous households, allowing to assess both aggregate and distributional effects of BBMs on mortgage and housing demand. The framework is applied to Lithuanian and Slovak distributional data to quantify the impact of various BBM configurations. We find that the presence of binding BBMs can usefully dampen mortgage and house price growth. However, tight regulation may also redirect demand towards lower-valued housing, while pushing households into the rental market. In particular, loan-to-value (LTV) limits are most constraining for households with little or no initial wealth. This highlights the distributional consequences of BBMs and the importance of designing regulation to account for borrower characteristics.

IMF Working PaperVol. 2026(066)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Housing Market and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.