Practice of radiation therapy for squamous cell esophageal cancer in Austria – a survey on behalf of the ÖGRO-GIT

To evaluate the patterns of care for chemoradiation for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagus in Austria. An anonymous questionnaire (57 items) was sent to all 14 public Austrian radiation oncology departments. Results were analyzed descriptively and compared to the latest versions of two major international guidelines. The response rate was 93%. The median number of patients per center per year was 13 (5–30). All centers reported pretreatment multidisciplinary evaluation. Work-up generally included endoscopy and cross-sectional imaging of chest/abdomen (mainly CT). EUS was used by 61% and PET-CT by 54%. Functional lung testing was reported only by 46%. No center reported the prophylactic placement of feeding tubes or stents. All centers employed IMRT in conventional fractionation with (mostly daily) IGRT. Weekly Carboplatin/Paclitaxel was the preferred chemotherapy regimen in both neoadjuvant (85%) and definitive (69%) settings, although only SCC were included. Neoadjuvant treatment was generally preferred for locally advanced stages in suitable patients, except for those with cervical tumor locations. Median doses to the primary tumor were 41.4 Gy (41.4–50.4 Gy) in the neoadjuvant and 57.7 Gy (50.4–66 Gy) in the definitive setting. Target volumes varied considerably (roughly half of the centers preferred involved vs. elective nodal irradiation). Definition of main OARs was uniform, but dose constraints to OAR differed widely. Intensive follow-up was performed in 77% for at least 5 years. The use of advanced staging procedures, prescription of total (boost) doses in the definitive setting, the issue of involved vs. elective nodal irradiation, and dose constraints to OARs were identified as major areas of disagreement between Austrian centers and inconsistencies with major guidelines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiation Oncology
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-026-02808-x
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Practice of radiation therapy for squamous cell esophageal cancer in Austria – a survey on behalf of the ÖGRO-GIT

S. Gerum, Susanne Schwaiger, K. Peterka, P. Harl et al.
Radiation Oncology
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

Practice of radiation therapy for squamous cell esophageal cancer in Austria – a survey on behalf of the ÖGRO-GIT

S. Gerum, Susanne Schwaiger, K. Peterka, P. Harl, Heidi Stranzl-Lawatsch, Falk Roeder, Patrick Clemens, Oxana Komina, C. Venhoda, Johanna Salinger, Michael Kopp, Robert Jaeger, Irene Reiter
article en

Abstract

To evaluate the patterns of care for chemoradiation for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagus in Austria. An anonymous questionnaire (57 items) was sent to all 14 public Austrian radiation oncology departments. Results were analyzed descriptively and compared to the latest versions of two major international guidelines. The response rate was 93%. The median number of patients per center per year was 13 (5–30). All centers reported pretreatment multidisciplinary evaluation. Work-up generally included endoscopy and cross-sectional imaging of chest/abdomen (mainly CT). EUS was used by 61% and PET-CT by 54%. Functional lung testing was reported only by 46%. No center reported the prophylactic placement of feeding tubes or stents. All centers employed IMRT in conventional fractionation with (mostly daily) IGRT. Weekly Carboplatin/Paclitaxel was the preferred chemotherapy regimen in both neoadjuvant (85%) and definitive (69%) settings, although only SCC were included. Neoadjuvant treatment was generally preferred for locally advanced stages in suitable patients, except for those with cervical tumor locations. Median doses to the primary tumor were 41.4 Gy (41.4–50.4 Gy) in the neoadjuvant and 57.7 Gy (50.4–66 Gy) in the definitive setting. Target volumes varied considerably (roughly half of the centers preferred involved vs. elective nodal irradiation). Definition of main OARs was uniform, but dose constraints to OAR differed widely. Intensive follow-up was performed in 77% for at least 5 years. The use of advanced staging procedures, prescription of total (boost) doses in the definitive setting, the issue of involved vs. elective nodal irradiation, and dose constraints to OARs were identified as major areas of disagreement between Austrian centers and inconsistencies with major guidelines.

Radiation Oncology
Innsbruck Medical University (AT), Universität Innsbruck (AT), Paracelsus Medical University (AT), Donauspital (AT), Fachhochschule Wiener Neustadt (AT), Landeskrankenhaus Feldkirch (AT), Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna (AT), Wilhelminen Hospital (AT), Graz University Hospital (AT), Wiener Krankenanstaltenverbund (AT), Universitätsklinikum Krems (AT), Kaiser-Franz-Josef-Spital (AT), Universitätsklinik für Strahlentherapie (DE), Schön Klinik Neustadt (DE), Salzburger Landeskliniken (AT), AGO Austria (AT), Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences (AT), Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.