Process intensification of multi-stage heat pump assisted distillation with liquid injection

• Liquid injection is proposed as an intensified strategy for multi-stage MVR distillation. • Four steady-state multi-stage MVR configurations are developed and compared. • Exchanger-based intercooling with heat recovery reduces compression work by reintegrating sensible heat. • Liquid injection eliminates an intercooler heat exchanger but can increase second-stage compression load. • Pre-compressor splitting offsets injection-induced penalties and enables competitive or improved energy performance. Multi-stage mechanical vapor recompression (MVR) is a promising route to electrify and intensify distillation for wide-boiling separations, yet its deployment is often constrained by the need for effective inter-stage cooling and meaningful utilization of the associated sensible heat. This work proposes and evaluates liquid injection as a compact intensification alternative to conventional exchanger-based intercooling in a two-stage MVR system. Unlike prior work on discretely heat integrated distillation column (D-HIDiC), this study introduces liquid injection directly in MVR systems, eliminating intercooler hardware while maintaining energy performance. Four processes are examined: a two-stage MVR without intercooling ( MVR #1 ), an intercooled MVR with internal heat recovery to an additional bottom reboiler ( MVR #2 ), a liquid injection MVR without an intercooler ( MVR #3 ), and a liquid injection MVR combined with pre-compressor splitting ( MVR #4 ) to mitigate the increased second-stage load caused by injection. Compared with conventional distillation (CDiC, 10,073 kW reboiler duty), all MVR cases reduce the final energy input to 1,759–1,850 kW (81.6–82.5% savings) with COP values of 5.445–5.727; MVR #4 achieves the lowest compressor power (1,759 kW) and the highest COP (5.727). On a primary-energy basis (36.6% electricity conversion efficiency), the MVR schemes deliver 49.8–52.3% savings versus CDiC. Overall, liquid injection enables equipment simplification with competitive efficiency, while pre-compressor splitting provides a practical tuning degree of freedom to recover or improve performance without sacrificing compactness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2026.110796
Primary Topic
Process Optimization and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Process intensification of multi-stage heat pump assisted distillation with liquid injection

Chengtian Cui, Anton A. Kiss
Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification
Process Optimization and Integration
article

Process intensification of multi-stage heat pump assisted distillation with liquid injection

Chengtian Cui, Anton A. Kiss
article en

Abstract

• Liquid injection is proposed as an intensified strategy for multi-stage MVR distillation. • Four steady-state multi-stage MVR configurations are developed and compared. • Exchanger-based intercooling with heat recovery reduces compression work by reintegrating sensible heat. • Liquid injection eliminates an intercooler heat exchanger but can increase second-stage compression load. • Pre-compressor splitting offsets injection-induced penalties and enables competitive or improved energy performance. Multi-stage mechanical vapor recompression (MVR) is a promising route to electrify and intensify distillation for wide-boiling separations, yet its deployment is often constrained by the need for effective inter-stage cooling and meaningful utilization of the associated sensible heat. This work proposes and evaluates liquid injection as a compact intensification alternative to conventional exchanger-based intercooling in a two-stage MVR system. Unlike prior work on discretely heat integrated distillation column (D-HIDiC), this study introduces liquid injection directly in MVR systems, eliminating intercooler hardware while maintaining energy performance. Four processes are examined: a two-stage MVR without intercooling ( MVR #1 ), an intercooled MVR with internal heat recovery to an additional bottom reboiler ( MVR #2 ), a liquid injection MVR without an intercooler ( MVR #3 ), and a liquid injection MVR combined with pre-compressor splitting ( MVR #4 ) to mitigate the increased second-stage load caused by injection. Compared with conventional distillation (CDiC, 10,073 kW reboiler duty), all MVR cases reduce the final energy input to 1,759–1,850 kW (81.6–82.5% savings) with COP values of 5.445–5.727; MVR #4 achieves the lowest compressor power (1,759 kW) and the highest COP (5.727). On a primary-energy basis (36.6% electricity conversion efficiency), the MVR schemes deliver 49.8–52.3% savings versus CDiC. Overall, liquid injection enables equipment simplification with competitive efficiency, while pre-compressor splitting provides a practical tuning degree of freedom to recover or improve performance without sacrificing compactness.

Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process IntensificationVol. 224
Åbo Akademi University (FI), Delft University of Technology (NL)
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions, HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Process Optimization and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.