Dental Composite Offers Comparable or Greater Pullout and Shear Strength to Lateral Mass Screw Fixation in a Human Cadaveric Model

BACKGROUND: Lateral mass screw fixation is the common method of fixation for an instrumented posterior fusion of the subaxial cervical spine. While screws have established efficacy, adhesive material that can be applied to the bony surface may be a promising alternative strategy owing to ease of application, size, and avoidance of screw loosening, malposition, or fracture. METHODS: tests with a 2-sided level of significance of α = 0.05. RESULTS: = 0.7). The composite failure mechanism under shear loading for half of the specimens was composite separation from bone, whereas the rest failed due to fractures distant from the composite site, indicating robust fixation integrity of composite to bone. CONCLUSIONS: Dental composite displayed similar shear strength and greater pullout strength compared with lateral mass screws. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: An adhesion-based fixation strategy may serve as a viable alternative to traditional screws in specific clinical scenarios that are worthy of further investigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Spine Surgery
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14444/8871
Primary Topic
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dental Composite Offers Comparable or Greater Pullout and Shear Strength to Lateral Mass Screw Fixation in a Human Cadaveric Model

Somayeh H. Ahmad, Serena S. Hu, Harsh Wadhwa, Olivia Okoli et al.
The International Journal of Spine Surgery
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
article

Dental Composite Offers Comparable or Greater Pullout and Shear Strength to Lateral Mass Screw Fixation in a Human Cadaveric Model

Somayeh H. Ahmad, Serena S. Hu, Harsh Wadhwa, Olivia Okoli, Karl C. Bruckman, James M. Mok, Anna Karnowska, Jayme C.B. Koltsov, Calvin Chan, Javier Castro
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lateral mass screw fixation is the common method of fixation for an instrumented posterior fusion of the subaxial cervical spine. While screws have established efficacy, adhesive material that can be applied to the bony surface may be a promising alternative strategy owing to ease of application, size, and avoidance of screw loosening, malposition, or fracture. METHODS: tests with a 2-sided level of significance of α = 0.05. RESULTS: = 0.7). The composite failure mechanism under shear loading for half of the specimens was composite separation from bone, whereas the rest failed due to fractures distant from the composite site, indicating robust fixation integrity of composite to bone. CONCLUSIONS: Dental composite displayed similar shear strength and greater pullout strength compared with lateral mass screws. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: An adhesion-based fixation strategy may serve as a viable alternative to traditional screws in specific clinical scenarios that are worthy of further investigation.

The International Journal of Spine Surgery
Stanford Medicine (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.