When does perceived overqualification enhance civil servants' work engagement? The role of public service motivation and ethical leadership

Perceived overqualification, the perception that employees' qualifications exceed their job requirements, is increasingly common among civil servants. Studies in the public sector have primarily focused on its negative outcomes. However, employees who perceive themselves as overqualified often possess surplus talent. The impact of perceived overqualification, whether positive or negative, depends on certain moderating conditions, which have received little attention. Drawing on the Ability-Motivation-Opportunity model, this study examines how public service motivation and ethical leadership moderate the relationship between perceived overqualification and work engagement, using data from 407 Chinese civil servants. The results indicate that when public service motivation is low, perceived overqualification negatively impacts work engagement. However, high public service motivation alone is insufficient to drive overqualified employees to increase work engagement. The study further identifies a three-way interaction among perceived overqualification, public service motivation, and ethical leadership, showing that ethical leadership helps overqualified employees with high public service motivation better utilize their abilities, thus enhancing work engagement. These findings provide valuable insights for mitigating the negative effects of perceived overqualification and leveraging the potential of overqualified civil servants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Psychologica
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106774
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When does perceived overqualification enhance civil servants' work engagement? The role of public service motivation and ethical leadership

Chenhui Liu, Wenzheng Qiu, Xinyu Dong
Acta Psychologica
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

When does perceived overqualification enhance civil servants' work engagement? The role of public service motivation and ethical leadership

Chenhui Liu, Wenzheng Qiu, Xinyu Dong
article en

Abstract

Perceived overqualification, the perception that employees' qualifications exceed their job requirements, is increasingly common among civil servants. Studies in the public sector have primarily focused on its negative outcomes. However, employees who perceive themselves as overqualified often possess surplus talent. The impact of perceived overqualification, whether positive or negative, depends on certain moderating conditions, which have received little attention. Drawing on the Ability-Motivation-Opportunity model, this study examines how public service motivation and ethical leadership moderate the relationship between perceived overqualification and work engagement, using data from 407 Chinese civil servants. The results indicate that when public service motivation is low, perceived overqualification negatively impacts work engagement. However, high public service motivation alone is insufficient to drive overqualified employees to increase work engagement. The study further identifies a three-way interaction among perceived overqualification, public service motivation, and ethical leadership, showing that ethical leadership helps overqualified employees with high public service motivation better utilize their abilities, thus enhancing work engagement. These findings provide valuable insights for mitigating the negative effects of perceived overqualification and leveraging the potential of overqualified civil servants.

Acta PsychologicaVol. 265
Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Major Program of National Fund of Philosophy and Social Science of China, National Social Science Fund of China
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.