Psychometric validation and cultural adaptation of executive functioning scale in Malaysian University students

Addressing the lack of culturally-appropriate assessment tools, this study adapted and validated the Executive Functioning Scale (EFS) for use within a Malaysian university student population. Utilizing a sample of 629 university students, we conducted a comprehensive psychometric evaluation of the adapted scale. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) supported a refined 50-item, six-factor structure that accounted for 65.87% of the total variance. Subsequent confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) revealed that a second-order hierarchical model-in which the six first-order factors loaded onto a single, higher-order Executive Functioning construct-provided an excellent fit to the data (CMIN/df = 1.447, CFI = .976, RMSEA = .026). Critically, its fit was virtually indistinguishable from a more complex first-order model, strongly favoring the hierarchical conceptualization on the basis of parsimony. The scale also demonstrated strong discriminative validity, effectively differentiating between high- and low-performing groups across all dimensions. Collectively, the findings establish the Malaysian-adapted EFS as a robust and valid instrument for assessing the multifaceted nature of executive functioning. This research provides the first psychometrically sound tool for measuring executive functioning tailored to this population, offering a critical resource for future cross-cultural research, clinical diagnostics, and educational interventions. The validated scale facilitates a more nuanced understanding of cognitive constructs within a non-Western higher education context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0341453
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychometric validation and cultural adaptation of executive functioning scale in Malaysian University students

Muhammad Amran, Hao Yin
PLoS ONE
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Psychometric validation and cultural adaptation of executive functioning scale in Malaysian University students

Muhammad Amran, Hao Yin
article en

Abstract

Addressing the lack of culturally-appropriate assessment tools, this study adapted and validated the Executive Functioning Scale (EFS) for use within a Malaysian university student population. Utilizing a sample of 629 university students, we conducted a comprehensive psychometric evaluation of the adapted scale. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) supported a refined 50-item, six-factor structure that accounted for 65.87% of the total variance. Subsequent confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) revealed that a second-order hierarchical model-in which the six first-order factors loaded onto a single, higher-order Executive Functioning construct-provided an excellent fit to the data (CMIN/df = 1.447, CFI = .976, RMSEA = .026). Critically, its fit was virtually indistinguishable from a more complex first-order model, strongly favoring the hierarchical conceptualization on the basis of parsimony. The scale also demonstrated strong discriminative validity, effectively differentiating between high- and low-performing groups across all dimensions. Collectively, the findings establish the Malaysian-adapted EFS as a robust and valid instrument for assessing the multifaceted nature of executive functioning. This research provides the first psychometrically sound tool for measuring executive functioning tailored to this population, offering a critical resource for future cross-cultural research, clinical diagnostics, and educational interventions. The validated scale facilitates a more nuanced understanding of cognitive constructs within a non-Western higher education context.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(4)
National University of Malaysia (MY)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.