Abstract 1470: Selecting representative histologic sections for cost-efficient 3D spatial transcriptomics and tumor microenvironment reconstruction.

Abstract Background: Three-dimensional spatial transcriptomics (ST) is essential for characterizing tumor-microenvironment (TME) heterogeneity but profiling every serial section is cost-prohibitive. Prior work has explored selecting subsets of sections for imputing ST at interleaved positions. However, these approaches do not identify which sections to profile to most efficiently preserve the 3D architecture. An optimal strategy must reinforce high-confidence inference in regions with similar composition while ensuring inclusion of morphologically distinct areas. We developed a computational framework to select histologic sections that optimally preserve 3D TME structure while minimizing the number requiring ST profiling. Methods: Four 3-mm FFPE colorectal cancer cores (two per patient) were collected to capture tumor-stroma interfaces and tertiary lymphoid structures. ∼300 serial 5-µm H&E sections per core (∼1500 µm depth) were imaged at 40x resolution; sections with sufficient tissue were retained (reported tissue loss at: TL 1150 µm, TR 350 µm, BL 1005 µm, BR 1100 µm). Retained sections were co-registered with VALIS. Eleven tissue classes—including tumor, desmoplastic stroma (DS), necrosis, smooth muscle, immune aggregates, and mucosa—were segmented using a graph neural network. For each section, we extracted Prov-GigaPath embeddings and tissue class area proportions. Pairwise similarities, incorporating histology features and z-distance, informed a facility location submodular optimization algorithm to select k representative sections (k=3-30). Selected subsets were used to reconstruct 3D TME structure via class-specific α-shape meshes and voxelization. Reconstruction fidelity was assessed using voxelized intersection-over-union (IoU) relative to full-section reconstructions. Results: Cores differed in composition—TL: normal mucosa 50%, smooth muscle 26%, stroma 11%, DS 10%; TR: tumor 49%, DS 49%; BL: smooth muscle 43%, tumor 32%, stroma 23%, inflammation 2%; BR: smooth muscle 71%, DS 14%, stroma 11%, tumor 3%. Weighted IoU increased with k; mixed-effects models showed each section improved IoU by 0.014 (p<2×10-16), with core-specific slopes TL 0.015, TR 0.019, BL 0.016, BR 0.013. Saturation occurred at TL 18, TR 12, BL 17, BR 16 sections, with maximum weighted IoUs of 0.49, 0.64, 0.68, and 0.50. Class-specific IoUs correlated with tissue class prevalence (ρ=0.81, p=3.6x10-5), with abundant classes reconstructing best. Conclusion: Section-selection algorithms can identify small subsets of H&E sections that preserve 3D TME structure for cost-efficient ST profiling. Although reconstruction fidelity reflects tissue class abundance, 15-20 sections sufficiently capture 3D architecture. Future work will refine selection strategies and integrate selected ST sections with interleaved H&E sections to enhance 3D reconstruction. Citation Format: Minh-Khang Le, James Evans, Harsimran Kaur, Sojung Lee, Vivek Pujara, Alan Joey Simmons, Seungwoo Kang, Jai Mehta, Louis J. Vaickus, Ken Lau, Joshua Jay Levy. Selecting representative histologic sections for cost-efficient 3D spatial transcriptomics and tumor microenvironment reconstruction [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 1470.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-1470
Primary Topic
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 1470: Selecting representative histologic sections for cost-efficient 3D spatial transcriptomics and tumor microenvironment reconstruction.

James R. Evans, Harsimran Kaur, Minh‐Khang Le, Jai M. Mehta et al.
Cancer Research
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
article

Abstract 1470: Selecting representative histologic sections for cost-efficient 3D spatial transcriptomics and tumor microenvironment reconstruction.

James R. Evans, Harsimran Kaur, Minh‐Khang Le, Jai M. Mehta, Louis Vaickus, Vivek Pujara, Seungwoo Kang, Alan Joey Simmons, Joshua Jay Levy, Ken Lau
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Three-dimensional spatial transcriptomics (ST) is essential for characterizing tumor-microenvironment (TME) heterogeneity but profiling every serial section is cost-prohibitive. Prior work has explored selecting subsets of sections for imputing ST at interleaved positions. However, these approaches do not identify which sections to profile to most efficiently preserve the 3D architecture. An optimal strategy must reinforce high-confidence inference in regions with similar composition while ensuring inclusion of morphologically distinct areas. We developed a computational framework to select histologic sections that optimally preserve 3D TME structure while minimizing the number requiring ST profiling. Methods: Four 3-mm FFPE colorectal cancer cores (two per patient) were collected to capture tumor-stroma interfaces and tertiary lymphoid structures. ∼300 serial 5-µm H&E sections per core (∼1500 µm depth) were imaged at 40x resolution; sections with sufficient tissue were retained (reported tissue loss at: TL 1150 µm, TR 350 µm, BL 1005 µm, BR 1100 µm). Retained sections were co-registered with VALIS. Eleven tissue classes—including tumor, desmoplastic stroma (DS), necrosis, smooth muscle, immune aggregates, and mucosa—were segmented using a graph neural network. For each section, we extracted Prov-GigaPath embeddings and tissue class area proportions. Pairwise similarities, incorporating histology features and z-distance, informed a facility location submodular optimization algorithm to select k representative sections (k=3-30). Selected subsets were used to reconstruct 3D TME structure via class-specific α-shape meshes and voxelization. Reconstruction fidelity was assessed using voxelized intersection-over-union (IoU) relative to full-section reconstructions. Results: Cores differed in composition—TL: normal mucosa 50%, smooth muscle 26%, stroma 11%, DS 10%; TR: tumor 49%, DS 49%; BL: smooth muscle 43%, tumor 32%, stroma 23%, inflammation 2%; BR: smooth muscle 71%, DS 14%, stroma 11%, tumor 3%. Weighted IoU increased with k; mixed-effects models showed each section improved IoU by 0.014 (p<2×10-16), with core-specific slopes TL 0.015, TR 0.019, BL 0.016, BR 0.013. Saturation occurred at TL 18, TR 12, BL 17, BR 16 sections, with maximum weighted IoUs of 0.49, 0.64, 0.68, and 0.50. Class-specific IoUs correlated with tissue class prevalence (ρ=0.81, p=3.6x10-5), with abundant classes reconstructing best. Conclusion: Section-selection algorithms can identify small subsets of H&E sections that preserve 3D TME structure for cost-efficient ST profiling. Although reconstruction fidelity reflects tissue class abundance, 15-20 sections sufficiently capture 3D architecture. Future work will refine selection strategies and integrate selected ST sections with interleaved H&E sections to enhance 3D reconstruction. Citation Format: Minh-Khang Le, James Evans, Harsimran Kaur, Sojung Lee, Vivek Pujara, Alan Joey Simmons, Seungwoo Kang, Jai Mehta, Louis J. Vaickus, Ken Lau, Joshua Jay Levy. Selecting representative histologic sections for cost-efficient 3D spatial transcriptomics and tumor microenvironment reconstruction [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 1470.

Cancer ResearchVol. 86(7_Supplement)
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center (US), Vanderbilt University (US), Knoxville College (US), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.