“You don’t have to be in poverty to need assistance to pay for child care”: Perspectives from middle-income New Mexico families receiving subsidized care

• NM expanded child care subsidy eligibility up to 400% of the federal poverty level. • Participating middle-income families reported gains in stability and well-being. • Participants reported gains in their children’s cognitive and social development. • Most burdens occurred from learning about eligibility or securing appropriate care. • Program benefits outweighed costs for middle-income, newly eligible participants. New Mexico has adopted some of the nation’s most expansive eligibility criteria for subsidized child care, creating novel opportunities to study the consequences of subsidy receipt for middle-income families. This study combines bounded rationality and the administrative burden framework, exploring middle-income families’ perceptions of whether and in what ways subsidized child care is sufficiently beneficial to outweigh the costs and burdens of participating in a means-tested government program. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 33 newly eligible subsidy recipients, who described benefits from subsidy receipt that included enhancements to their economic stability, employment, emotional well-being, and their children’s social and cognitive development. Parents also highlighted additional gains, including opportunities to pursue education, select higher quality care settings that would otherwise be unaffordable, and access support for their children’s language development. Parents described relatively few compliance burdens from program participation, and most often experienced burdens related to learning about program eligibility and processes, worrying about policy sustainability, and finding and enrolling in available care that met their needs. Some parents noted limits to the subsidy’s benefits, citing concerns about teacher turnover, inconsistent quality of care, and practices that did not fully align with their parenting preferences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Children and Youth Services Review
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2026.108940
Primary Topic
Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“You don’t have to be in poverty to need assistance to pay for child care”: Perspectives from middle-income New Mexico families receiving subsidized care

Monica Fiorella Asencio Pimentel, Hailey Heinz, Rebecca Fowler, Mary Nava et al.
Children and Youth Services Review
Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
article

“You don’t have to be in poverty to need assistance to pay for child care”: Perspectives from middle-income New Mexico families receiving subsidized care

Monica Fiorella Asencio Pimentel, Hailey Heinz, Rebecca Fowler, Mary Nava, Jill Okun, David Purcell, Dana Bell
article en

Abstract

• NM expanded child care subsidy eligibility up to 400% of the federal poverty level. • Participating middle-income families reported gains in stability and well-being. • Participants reported gains in their children’s cognitive and social development. • Most burdens occurred from learning about eligibility or securing appropriate care. • Program benefits outweighed costs for middle-income, newly eligible participants. New Mexico has adopted some of the nation’s most expansive eligibility criteria for subsidized child care, creating novel opportunities to study the consequences of subsidy receipt for middle-income families. This study combines bounded rationality and the administrative burden framework, exploring middle-income families’ perceptions of whether and in what ways subsidized child care is sufficiently beneficial to outweigh the costs and burdens of participating in a means-tested government program. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 33 newly eligible subsidy recipients, who described benefits from subsidy receipt that included enhancements to their economic stability, employment, emotional well-being, and their children’s social and cognitive development. Parents also highlighted additional gains, including opportunities to pursue education, select higher quality care settings that would otherwise be unaffordable, and access support for their children’s language development. Parents described relatively few compliance burdens from program participation, and most often experienced burdens related to learning about program eligibility and processes, worrying about policy sustainability, and finding and enrolling in available care that met their needs. Some parents noted limits to the subsidy’s benefits, citing concerns about teacher turnover, inconsistent quality of care, and practices that did not fully align with their parenting preferences.

Children and Youth Services ReviewVol. 185
University of New Mexico (US)
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.