New Second Amendment standards and suicide prevention: need for cross-disciplinary research and collaboration

will be applied by courts, we argue that injury prevention researchers should collaborate with scholars in history, law and communication science to develop and defend policies that prevent firearm suicides. We outline four areas for interdisciplinary collaboration.First, developing a nuanced understanding of characteristics that enhance the effectiveness of existing policies can guide policymaking if courts take issue with some policy features but not others. Second, highlighting ways in which firearm policies link to historical suicide prevention efforts can demonstrate how modern policies are consistent with past practices. Meanwhile, exposing historical misunderstandings regarding mental health and suicide can explain differences between modern and historical policies. Third, educating the public about firearm suicide and the efficacy of policies to prevent suicide can increase support for these policies, especially if informed by dissemination research. Fourth, interdisciplinary researchers can work with stakeholders to develop policy solutions garnering broad support that are resilient to Second Amendment challenges. As Second Amendment law evolves, interdisciplinary research into suicide prevention policies, their historical context and strategies for disseminating this information is essential.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Injury Prevention
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/ip-2025-045947
Primary Topic
Gun Ownership and Violence Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New Second Amendment standards and suicide prevention: need for cross-disciplinary research and collaboration

Eric Ruben, Gabriela Kattan Khazanov
Injury Prevention
Gun Ownership and Violence Research
article

New Second Amendment standards and suicide prevention: need for cross-disciplinary research and collaboration

Eric Ruben, Gabriela Kattan Khazanov
article en

Abstract

will be applied by courts, we argue that injury prevention researchers should collaborate with scholars in history, law and communication science to develop and defend policies that prevent firearm suicides. We outline four areas for interdisciplinary collaboration.First, developing a nuanced understanding of characteristics that enhance the effectiveness of existing policies can guide policymaking if courts take issue with some policy features but not others. Second, highlighting ways in which firearm policies link to historical suicide prevention efforts can demonstrate how modern policies are consistent with past practices. Meanwhile, exposing historical misunderstandings regarding mental health and suicide can explain differences between modern and historical policies. Third, educating the public about firearm suicide and the efficacy of policies to prevent suicide can increase support for these policies, especially if informed by dissemination research. Fourth, interdisciplinary researchers can work with stakeholders to develop policy solutions garnering broad support that are resilient to Second Amendment challenges. As Second Amendment law evolves, interdisciplinary research into suicide prevention policies, their historical context and strategies for disseminating this information is essential.

Injury Prevention
Southern Methodist University (US), Yeshiva University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Gun Ownership and Violence Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.