Abstract 35: Humans cannot live by artificial intelligence (AI) alone.

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Differential expression (DE) analysis is the cornerstone of omics evaluation. It is used to identify biomarkers for cancer, therapeutic response, and drug-induced adverse events. DE methods use AI/ML (machine learning). If multiple DE methods could identify the same biomarkers, this would strongly support the biomarker’s use as a robust candidate(s) for wet lab validation studies. It is unclear if the top DE methods identify the same biomarkers (i.e., shared). Therefore, we evaluated 4 DE methods for their ability to identify shared serum autoantibodies in cancer patients with and without immune-checkpoint inhibitor induced hypothyroidism (TEAE ThyDis). METHODS: Patients with breast cancer (N=8) or melanoma (N=25) who were treated with durvalumab, ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, or combination who had TEAE ThyDis (N = 18) or No TEAE (N = 15) were included. Four DE methods (limma, DESeq2, edgeR, randomForest) were used in R. 15,500 pre-treatment autoantibodies with and without ComBat batch correction were evaluated for each patient. RESULTS: In patients with breast cancer, limma, DESeq2, edgeR, and randomForest identified 201, 109, 158, and 472 biomarkers, respectively (Table 1). However, only up to 53 biomarkers were shared between the 4 DE methods. ComBat batch correction with limma or randomForest led to identification of 125 and 484 biomarkers respectively and up to 114 shared biomarkers between the 4 methods. In patients with melanoma, limma, DESeq2, edgeR, and randomForest identified 198, 244, 568, and 1042 biomarkers respectively with up to 183 biomarkers shared (Table 1). ComBat batch correction with limma or randomForest led to identification of 196 and 1088 biomarkers respectively and up to 257 shared. There was no biomarker that was shared in all methods. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggests that top AI/ML DE analysis methods identify different biomarkers. As a field, it is time to re-evaluate and re-vamp these tools as well as create new tools to ensure robust reproducible biomarker identifications. Citation Format: Kim Blenman, Ondrej Blaha, Sherry Qiu, Kelly Chen, Kiera Spall, Yiran Liu, Madsion Williams, Marissa Villa, Valeri Vankov, Kwabena Oteng Agyapong, Di Li, Holly Rushmeier. Humans cannot live by artificial intelligence (AI) alone [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 35.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-35
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 35: Humans cannot live by artificial intelligence (AI) alone.

Kwabena Oteng Agyapong, Sherry Qiu, D. Li, Kelly S. Chen et al.
Cancer Research
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

Abstract 35: Humans cannot live by artificial intelligence (AI) alone.

Kwabena Oteng Agyapong, Sherry Qiu, D. Li, Kelly S. Chen, Ondřej Bláha, Holly Rushmeier, Ying Liu, Kiera Spall, Valeri Vankov, Kim Blenman, Madsion Williams
article en

Abstract

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Differential expression (DE) analysis is the cornerstone of omics evaluation. It is used to identify biomarkers for cancer, therapeutic response, and drug-induced adverse events. DE methods use AI/ML (machine learning). If multiple DE methods could identify the same biomarkers, this would strongly support the biomarker’s use as a robust candidate(s) for wet lab validation studies. It is unclear if the top DE methods identify the same biomarkers (i.e., shared). Therefore, we evaluated 4 DE methods for their ability to identify shared serum autoantibodies in cancer patients with and without immune-checkpoint inhibitor induced hypothyroidism (TEAE ThyDis). METHODS: Patients with breast cancer (N=8) or melanoma (N=25) who were treated with durvalumab, ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, or combination who had TEAE ThyDis (N = 18) or No TEAE (N = 15) were included. Four DE methods (limma, DESeq2, edgeR, randomForest) were used in R. 15,500 pre-treatment autoantibodies with and without ComBat batch correction were evaluated for each patient. RESULTS: In patients with breast cancer, limma, DESeq2, edgeR, and randomForest identified 201, 109, 158, and 472 biomarkers, respectively (Table 1). However, only up to 53 biomarkers were shared between the 4 DE methods. ComBat batch correction with limma or randomForest led to identification of 125 and 484 biomarkers respectively and up to 114 shared biomarkers between the 4 methods. In patients with melanoma, limma, DESeq2, edgeR, and randomForest identified 198, 244, 568, and 1042 biomarkers respectively with up to 183 biomarkers shared (Table 1). ComBat batch correction with limma or randomForest led to identification of 196 and 1088 biomarkers respectively and up to 257 shared. There was no biomarker that was shared in all methods. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggests that top AI/ML DE analysis methods identify different biomarkers. As a field, it is time to re-evaluate and re-vamp these tools as well as create new tools to ensure robust reproducible biomarker identifications. Citation Format: Kim Blenman, Ondrej Blaha, Sherry Qiu, Kelly Chen, Kiera Spall, Yiran Liu, Madsion Williams, Marissa Villa, Valeri Vankov, Kwabena Oteng Agyapong, Di Li, Holly Rushmeier. Humans cannot live by artificial intelligence (AI) alone [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 35.

Cancer ResearchVol. 86(7_Supplement)
Yale University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.