Effectiveness of an online emotional intelligence training among athletes: Do defense mechanisms matter?

• Adaptive defense mechanisms (ADM) increased throughout the entire EI training. • Maladaptive defense mechanisms (MDM) decreased following EI training. • Online EI training was associated with changes in trait EI and neuroticism over time. • High MDM predicted slower EI growth and lower agreeableness and conscientiousness. • High ADM predicted higher trait EI, higher agreeableness, and lower neuroticism. This study examined changes associated with participation in an online emotional intelligence (EI) training program (API-D) and explored how defense mechanisms predict changes in EI and personality traits throughout the intervention. A total of 96 athletes (67 women) participated in this study; a training group ( n = 50) received the 8-week, two-phase API-D online program, while a control group ( n = 46) did not. All athletes completed self-report measures of defense mechanisms, trait EI, and personality traits at three measurement points: before the intervention, after phase one (knowledge development phase), and after phase two (abilities development phase). For the training group, repeated measures ANOVAs showed an increase in adaptive defense mechanisms (ADM) and a decrease in maladaptive defense mechanisms (MDM). Multilevel Growth Curve Analysis revealed a linear increase in the global score of trait EI and a linear decrease in neuroticism throughout the intervention. Findings also indicated that defense mechanisms influenced the trajectories of trait EI and personality traits. Participation in the API-D program was associated with increases in trait EI, reductions in neuroticism, and more adaptive defensive functioning across the intervention. ADM were associated with higher trait EI, suggesting that they foster psychological readiness for EI learning. In contrast, MDM predicted lower EI and showed slower improvement over time, underlining their potential role as barriers to EI development during training. Overall, these findings highlight the role that defense mechanisms as psychological processes may play, as they can either facilitate or hinder athletes’ EI development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Performance Enhancement & Health
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peh.2026.100433
Primary Topic
Emotional Intelligence and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of an online emotional intelligence training among athletes: Do defense mechanisms matter?

Yves de Roten, Michel Nicolas, Guillaume Levillain, Sylvain Laborde et al.
Performance Enhancement & Health
Emotional Intelligence and Performance
article

Effectiveness of an online emotional intelligence training among athletes: Do defense mechanisms matter?

Yves de Roten, Michel Nicolas, Guillaume Levillain, Sylvain Laborde, Guillaume Martinent, Xavier Sanchez
article en

Abstract

• Adaptive defense mechanisms (ADM) increased throughout the entire EI training. • Maladaptive defense mechanisms (MDM) decreased following EI training. • Online EI training was associated with changes in trait EI and neuroticism over time. • High MDM predicted slower EI growth and lower agreeableness and conscientiousness. • High ADM predicted higher trait EI, higher agreeableness, and lower neuroticism. This study examined changes associated with participation in an online emotional intelligence (EI) training program (API-D) and explored how defense mechanisms predict changes in EI and personality traits throughout the intervention. A total of 96 athletes (67 women) participated in this study; a training group ( n = 50) received the 8-week, two-phase API-D online program, while a control group ( n = 46) did not. All athletes completed self-report measures of defense mechanisms, trait EI, and personality traits at three measurement points: before the intervention, after phase one (knowledge development phase), and after phase two (abilities development phase). For the training group, repeated measures ANOVAs showed an increase in adaptive defense mechanisms (ADM) and a decrease in maladaptive defense mechanisms (MDM). Multilevel Growth Curve Analysis revealed a linear increase in the global score of trait EI and a linear decrease in neuroticism throughout the intervention. Findings also indicated that defense mechanisms influenced the trajectories of trait EI and personality traits. Participation in the API-D program was associated with increases in trait EI, reductions in neuroticism, and more adaptive defensive functioning across the intervention. ADM were associated with higher trait EI, suggesting that they foster psychological readiness for EI learning. In contrast, MDM predicted lower EI and showed slower improvement over time, underlining their potential role as barriers to EI development during training. Overall, these findings highlight the role that defense mechanisms as psychological processes may play, as they can either facilitate or hinder athletes’ EI development.

Performance Enhancement & HealthVol. 14(3)
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), Université d'Orléans (FR), German Sport University Cologne (DE), Université de Bourgogne (FR), Hôpital de Cery (CH)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Emotional Intelligence and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.