Current use and future directions of neuroscience tools in the tourism and hospitality industry: a comparative perspective of academia and industry

Purpose This study aims to examine the current and potential use of neuroscience-based methods in the tourism and hospitality field by exploring the perceptions, expectations and application tendencies of both academics and managers of companies providing neuromarketing services in the industry. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative research design was employed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with tourism academics and managers of neuromarketing service providers. The data were analysed using content analysis. Findings The findings indicate that academics view neuroscience-based tools as valuable complementary methods that can address the limitations of self-report measures. Managers of neuromarketing companies, on the other hand, tend to evaluate these methods mainly in relation to marketing campaigns, digital content performance and customer experience design. Both groups emphasised various practical constraints affecting the diffusion of these tools in the tourism field. Originality/value The study offers a stakeholder-oriented perspective by jointly examining academic and industry-based views on the use of neuroscience tools in tourism and hospitality, and by highlighting current practices as well as future directions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/whatt-01-2026-0002
Primary Topic
Digital Marketing and Social Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Current use and future directions of neuroscience tools in the tourism and hospitality industry: a comparative perspective of academia and industry

Betül YEŞİLTEPE ERKAYIRAN
Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes
Digital Marketing and Social Media
article

Current use and future directions of neuroscience tools in the tourism and hospitality industry: a comparative perspective of academia and industry

Betül YEŞİLTEPE ERKAYIRAN
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine the current and potential use of neuroscience-based methods in the tourism and hospitality field by exploring the perceptions, expectations and application tendencies of both academics and managers of companies providing neuromarketing services in the industry. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative research design was employed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with tourism academics and managers of neuromarketing service providers. The data were analysed using content analysis. Findings The findings indicate that academics view neuroscience-based tools as valuable complementary methods that can address the limitations of self-report measures. Managers of neuromarketing companies, on the other hand, tend to evaluate these methods mainly in relation to marketing campaigns, digital content performance and customer experience design. Both groups emphasised various practical constraints affecting the diffusion of these tools in the tourism field. Originality/value The study offers a stakeholder-oriented perspective by jointly examining academic and industry-based views on the use of neuroscience tools in tourism and hospitality, and by highlighting current practices as well as future directions.

Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes
Adnan Menderes University (TR)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Digital Marketing and Social Media
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.