Advanced automated insulin delivery in inpatients receiving nutritional support: a single-center, open-label, randomised controlled trial

AIMS: This study addressed the challenge of glucose management in inpatients receiving nutritional support, even with automated insulin delivery (AID). We evaluated whether advanced AID would improve glycaemic control compared with standard subcutaneous insulin therapy in inpatients receiving nutrition support. METHODS: We did a single-centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial in adult inpatients receiving nutrition support who required subcutaneous insulin therapy. Patients recruited from non-critical care surgical and medical wards were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive advanced AID or conventional subcutaneous insulin therapy (control group) given in accordance with local clinical practice. Patients were followed up for up to 20 days or until hospital discharge. The primary endpoint was the TIR, the proportion of time that sensor glucose concentrations were within the target range, 3.9-10.0 mmol/l. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number ChiCTR2300078746. RESULTS: Between February 2023 and September 2024, 32 patients were assessed for eligibility; of these, 26 were enrolled and randomly assigned to the closed-loop group (n = 13) or the control group (n = 13). TIR was 63.1 % [SD 12.8] in the closed-loop group and 31.5 % [20.1]in the control group (difference 31.7 percentage points [95 % CI 18.0-45.2; P < 0.001]). The time spent below the target range (< 3.9 mmol/l) did not differ between groups. No serious adverse event occurred in each group. No episodes of severe hypoglycaemia or hyperglycaemia with ketonaemia occurred in either study group. CONCLUSIONS: The advanced AID system improves glycaemic control without increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia in inpatients receiving nutrition support, particularly in patients with acute severe pancreatitis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes & Metabolism
Published
2026-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabet.2026.101758
Primary Topic
Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advanced automated insulin delivery in inpatients receiving nutritional support: a single-center, open-label, randomised controlled trial

Linting Xun, Heng Su, Yunying Cai, Yanming Chen et al.
Diabetes & Metabolism
Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
article

Advanced automated insulin delivery in inpatients receiving nutritional support: a single-center, open-label, randomised controlled trial

Linting Xun, Heng Su, Yunying Cai, Yanming Chen, Le Ma
article en

Abstract

AIMS: This study addressed the challenge of glucose management in inpatients receiving nutritional support, even with automated insulin delivery (AID). We evaluated whether advanced AID would improve glycaemic control compared with standard subcutaneous insulin therapy in inpatients receiving nutrition support. METHODS: We did a single-centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial in adult inpatients receiving nutrition support who required subcutaneous insulin therapy. Patients recruited from non-critical care surgical and medical wards were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive advanced AID or conventional subcutaneous insulin therapy (control group) given in accordance with local clinical practice. Patients were followed up for up to 20 days or until hospital discharge. The primary endpoint was the TIR, the proportion of time that sensor glucose concentrations were within the target range, 3.9-10.0 mmol/l. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number ChiCTR2300078746. RESULTS: Between February 2023 and September 2024, 32 patients were assessed for eligibility; of these, 26 were enrolled and randomly assigned to the closed-loop group (n = 13) or the control group (n = 13). TIR was 63.1 % [SD 12.8] in the closed-loop group and 31.5 % [20.1]in the control group (difference 31.7 percentage points [95 % CI 18.0-45.2; P < 0.001]). The time spent below the target range (< 3.9 mmol/l) did not differ between groups. No serious adverse event occurred in each group. No episodes of severe hypoglycaemia or hyperglycaemia with ketonaemia occurred in either study group. CONCLUSIONS: The advanced AID system improves glycaemic control without increasing the risk of hypoglycaemia in inpatients receiving nutrition support, particularly in patients with acute severe pancreatitis.

Diabetes & MetabolismVol. 52(3)
Kunming University of Science and Technology (CN), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Kunming Medical University (CN), Fuwai Yunnan Cardiovascular Hospital (CN), First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province (CN), The First Hospital of Kunming (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (CN)
Health Commission of Yunan Province
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.